🧠 Test Your Knowledge!
Memory as an Active Process » Bartlett War of the Ghosts Study
What you'll learn this session
Study time: 30 minutes
- Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study and its methodology
- The concept of schema theory and reconstructive memory
- How cultural factors influence memory recall
- The key findings and conclusions of Bartlett's research
- Strengths and limitations of Bartlett's study
- Real-world applications of Bartlett's findings
Bartlett's War of the Ghosts Study
In 1932, Sir Frederic Bartlett conducted a groundbreaking study that challenged how we understand memory. Rather than seeing memory as a perfect recording of events, Bartlett showed that memory is an active process where we reconstruct information based on our existing knowledge and cultural background.
Key Definitions:
- Schema: A mental framework of knowledge and expectations that helps us organise and interpret information.
- Reconstructive memory: The process of rebuilding memories using existing knowledge rather than retrieving exact copies of past experiences.
- Serial reproduction: A research method where information is passed from one person to another in sequence.
📖 The Original Story
Bartlett used a Native American folktale called "The War of the Ghosts." The story contained unfamiliar cultural elements for British participants, including supernatural events and unfamiliar concepts. This made it perfect for testing how people reconstruct unfamiliar information.
🧠 Bartlett's Hypothesis
Bartlett believed that memory isn't like a tape recorder that plays back events exactly as they happened. Instead, he thought people reconstruct memories using their existing knowledge (schemas) to fill in gaps and make unfamiliar information more understandable.
The Study Method
Bartlett's research used several methods, but his most famous was the method of repeated reproduction:
Repeated Reproduction Method
Participants read "The War of the Ghosts" story and were asked to recall it at various time intervals:
- First recall: After a short interval (15-30 minutes)
- Subsequent recalls: At intervals ranging from days to years
Bartlett carefully recorded how the story changed with each retelling by the same person over time.
The War of the Ghosts - Original Story Excerpt
"One night two young men from Egulac went down to the river to hunt seals and while they were there it became foggy and calm. Then they heard war-cries and they thought: 'Maybe this is a war-party'. They escaped to the shore and hid behind a log. Now canoes came up and they heard the noise of paddles and saw one canoe coming up to them. There were five men in the canoe and they said: 'What do you think? We wish to take you along. We are going up the river to make war on the people'..."
The story continues with supernatural elements including ghosts, a man who doesn't feel wounded despite being shot with an arrow and characters who eventually die because their spirits had been taken away.
Key Findings
As participants recalled the story over time, Bartlett observed consistent patterns in how the story changed:
📝 Omission
Details that seemed irrelevant or difficult to understand were left out. For example, specific names and unfamiliar cultural references were often omitted.
🔁 Transformation
Unfamiliar elements were changed to more familiar ones. "Canoes" became "boats," and "hunting seals" became "fishing."
📊 Rationalisation
Participants added explanations to make the story more logical according to their cultural expectations. Supernatural elements were often explained away or modified.
Cultural Influences on Recall
Bartlett found that participants reconstructed the story to fit their own cultural expectations:
- Supernatural elements (ghosts) were either omitted or rationalised
- The narrative structure was changed to follow more familiar Western storytelling patterns
- Unfamiliar concepts were replaced with familiar ones from the participants' culture
💡 Schema Theory
Based on his findings, Bartlett developed schema theory. He proposed that we use existing mental frameworks (schemas) to understand and remember new information. When recalling information, we reconstruct memories using these schemas, which can lead to distortions that make the memory more aligned with our existing knowledge.
💭 Memory as Construction
Bartlett concluded that memory is not reproductive (exact copies) but reconstructive. We actively rebuild memories using our schemas, making them more coherent, shorter and more conventional according to our cultural background.
Evaluating Bartlett's Study
✅ Strengths
- Used meaningful material (a story) rather than nonsense syllables, making it more relevant to real-life memory
- Demonstrated the active, reconstructive nature of memory
- Highlighted the importance of cultural factors in memory processes
- Influenced decades of research on memory and cognition
❌ Limitations
- Lacked scientific rigour - methods weren't standardised across participants
- Small sample size with limited demographic diversity
- Qualitative rather than quantitative analysis makes results difficult to measure precisely
- Laboratory setting may not reflect how memory works in everyday situations
Real-World Applications
Bartlett's findings have important implications in many areas:
👤 Eyewitness Testimony
Shows why eyewitness accounts may be unreliable - witnesses reconstruct memories based on expectations and can be influenced by leading questions.
🏫 Education
Helps teachers understand how students integrate new information with existing knowledge, emphasising the importance of building on prior knowledge.
💬 Cross-Cultural Communication
Explains why people from different cultures may interpret and remember the same events differently based on their cultural schemas.
Modern Research Development
Elizabeth Loftus extended Bartlett's work in the 1970s with her research on the misinformation effect. She showed how easily memories can be altered by post-event information, further supporting Bartlett's view that memory is reconstructive rather than reproductive.
In one famous study, participants who were shown misleading information after watching a video of a car accident gave inaccurate testimony about what they had seen, demonstrating how memories can be altered after the event.
Summary: Why Bartlett's Study Matters
Bartlett's "War of the Ghosts" study revolutionised our understanding of memory by showing that:
- Memory is an active, reconstructive process, not a passive recording
- We use schemas (existing knowledge frameworks) to interpret and remember new information
- Cultural background significantly influences how we remember information
- Memory errors follow predictable patterns (omission, transformation, rationalisation)
This research laid the groundwork for modern cognitive psychology and continues to influence how we understand memory processes today. When you remember something, you're not playing back a recording you're actively rebuilding that memory using your existing knowledge and expectations.
Log in to track your progress and mark lessons as complete!
Login Now
Don't have an account? Sign up here.