Database results:
    examBoard: AQA
    examType: GCSE
    lessonTitle: Review and Practice - Reconstructive Memory
    
Psychology - Cognition and Behaviour - Memory - Memory as an Active Process - Review and Practice - Reconstructive Memory - BrainyLemons
« Back to Menu 🧠 Test Your Knowledge!

Memory as an Active Process » Review and Practice - Reconstructive Memory

What you'll learn this session

Study time: 30 minutes

  • The concept of reconstructive memory and why memory is an active process
  • Bartlett's War of the Ghosts study and its significance
  • Key processes in memory reconstruction: schemas, confabulation and effort after meaning
  • Factors affecting the accuracy of eyewitness testimony
  • How to evaluate research on reconstructive memory
  • Real-world applications of reconstructive memory research

Understanding Reconstructive Memory

Memory isn't like a video recorder that captures and stores everything exactly as it happened. Instead, our memories are actively constructed and reconstructed each time we recall them. This process is known as reconstructive memory.

Key Definitions:

  • Reconstructive memory: The process where memories are actively rebuilt during recall, influenced by existing knowledge, beliefs and expectations.
  • Schema: A mental framework or package of knowledge about a particular topic that helps us organise and interpret information.
  • Confabulation: The unconscious filling in of gaps in memory with fabricated, distorted or misinterpreted information believed to be true.
  • Effort after meaning: The tendency to make unfamiliar information fit with our existing understanding of the world.

💡 Why Memory is Reconstructive

Our brains don't have unlimited storage capacity, so we don't store every detail of our experiences. Instead, we store the gist or key points and then reconstruct the rest when needed. This process is influenced by:

  • Our existing knowledge and schemas
  • Cultural expectations and norms
  • Personal biases and beliefs
  • Post-event information we receive

📖 Bartlett's War of the Ghosts

Sir Frederic Bartlett (1932) conducted a groundbreaking study that demonstrated reconstructive memory. He asked British participants to read and recall an unfamiliar Native American folk tale called "The War of the Ghosts." When participants recalled the story later, they:

  • Shortened it
  • Rationalised unusual elements
  • Changed details to fit their cultural expectations
  • Omitted unfamiliar concepts

Key Processes in Memory Reconstruction

🛠 Schemas

Schemas are mental frameworks that organise our knowledge about the world. When we recall memories, we use schemas to fill in missing details.

Example: If you're recalling a visit to a restaurant, your "restaurant schema" might lead you to remember ordering food even if you're not sure exactly what you ate.

🧠 Confabulation

Confabulation occurs when we unconsciously fill gaps in our memory with invented details that we believe to be true.

Example: A witness might "remember" a criminal wearing a hat because that fits their schema of what criminals look like, even if no hat was present.

🔍 Effort After Meaning

This is our tendency to make unfamiliar information fit with our existing understanding.

Example: In Bartlett's study, participants changed "hunting seals" to "fishing" because it was more familiar to their culture.

Case Study Focus: Bartlett's War of the Ghosts

Bartlett used a Native American folk tale that contained unfamiliar cultural elements for his British participants. The story involved supernatural elements like ghosts leaving bodies and people dying without visible wounds.

When participants recalled the story (sometimes months later), they made it shorter and more coherent according to their cultural expectations. Supernatural elements were either rationalised or omitted. For example:

  • Original: "The young man did not feel sick, but he had seen something that made him feel queer."
  • Recall: "The young man did not feel well."

This study showed how memory is reconstructed based on cultural schemas and demonstrated that we remember the gist rather than exact details.

Eyewitness Testimony and Reconstructive Memory

Understanding reconstructive memory is crucial when considering eyewitness testimony in legal settings. Research has shown that eyewitness accounts can be highly unreliable due to the reconstructive nature of memory.

Factors Affecting Eyewitness Accuracy

Misleading Post-Event Information

Information received after an event can be incorporated into the original memory. Elizabeth Loftus demonstrated this in her classic car crash studies:

Participants who were asked "How fast were the cars going when they smashed into each other?" estimated higher speeds than those asked about cars that "hit" each other. A week later, the "smashed" group were more likely to falsely remember seeing broken glass.

💪 Weapon Focus Effect

When a weapon is present during a crime, witnesses often focus their attention on the weapon rather than the perpetrator's face or other details.

This narrows attention and reduces the accuracy of identification and recall of other details. This is an evolutionary response - we focus on the immediate threat.

Evaluating Research on Reconstructive Memory

Strengths

  • Real-world applications: Research has led to improved police interview techniques like the Cognitive Interview.
  • Experimental support: Laboratory studies by Loftus and others provide strong evidence for memory reconstruction.
  • Cross-cultural validation: Studies across different cultures show similar reconstructive processes.

Limitations

  • Ecological validity: Lab studies may not reflect how memory works in real-life emotional situations.
  • Individual differences: Some people have more accurate memories than others.
  • Ethical concerns: Studies involving false memories raise ethical questions about manipulating participants' memories.

Real-World Applications

Understanding reconstructive memory has important applications in many areas:

Legal System

The Cognitive Interview technique was developed to improve eyewitness recall by asking witnesses to recreate the context of the event and recall from different perspectives.

🏫 Education

Teachers can help students build accurate memories by connecting new information to existing schemas and providing multiple opportunities for retrieval practice.

💬 Therapy

Understanding that memories can be reconstructed helps therapists work with traumatic memories and recognise that recovered memories may not be entirely accurate.

Case Study: The Cognitive Interview

The Cognitive Interview was developed by psychologists Geiselman and Fisher in the 1980s as a way to improve eyewitness recall. It uses techniques based on our understanding of reconstructive memory:

  1. Mental reinstatement: Witnesses mentally recreate the context of the event (weather, emotions, sounds).
  2. Report everything: Witnesses are encouraged to report all details, even those that seem unimportant.
  3. Change perspective: Witnesses try to recall the event from different viewpoints.
  4. Change order: Witnesses recall the event in different orders (backwards, from the middle).

Research shows this technique can increase accurate recall by 25-40% compared to standard police interviews.

Summary: Key Points to Remember

  • Memory is reconstructive rather than reproductive - we rebuild memories each time we recall them.
  • Schemas, confabulation and effort after meaning are key processes in memory reconstruction.
  • Bartlett's "War of the Ghosts" study demonstrated how cultural schemas influence memory reconstruction.
  • Eyewitness testimony can be unreliable due to factors like misleading post-event information and weapon focus.
  • Understanding reconstructive memory has important applications in legal settings, education and therapy.
🧠 Test Your Knowledge!
Chat to Psychology tutor