💬 Shaping attitudes
If your friends think smoking or drinking is fun and harmless, you are more likely to think so too. Time spent with a group slowly changes what seems acceptable.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseThe last two lessons looked at nature: genes passed down in families. This lesson looks at nurture. The psychological explanation says that addiction is shaped by what happens to us and who we spend time with. For teenagers, one of the biggest influences is the people around them.
Key terms:
The explanation says that friends and social groups can lead a person towards substances in four main ways.
If your friends think smoking or drinking is fun and harmless, you are more likely to think so too. Time spent with a group slowly changes what seems acceptable.
You see friends using a substance and it looks normal, even cool. You may copy them, especially if they are popular or have a status you admire.
Friends make a substance easy to get. A first try is much more likely when someone hands you a drink or a vape at a party than when you have to find one alone.
Direct pressure sounds like "Go on, everyone's having one". Indirect pressure is silent: you worry about being left out or laughed at if you say no, so you join in.
Trying a substance is not the same as being addicted. But the explanation says that peers help a person to start, and repeated use with the group can build up into the cravings and tolerance you met in Characteristics of Addiction.
People pay close attention to what others do. A social norm is a kind of unwritten rule. If a teenager believes that "everyone does it", then using a substance feels normal, and not using it feels odd.
Often the belief is wrong. A teenager may think far more people their age drink or vape than really do, because the ones who do are the most noticeable. Even so, a false belief can still change behaviour. The pressure to fit in is the same one behind normative influence in Social Factors in Conformity: people go along with the group to be liked and accepted.
Peer influence is thought to be strongest in the teenage years. At this age:
Mia, 15, has never smoked. She joins a new friendship group. Everyone vapes at the park after school. Nobody forces her, but one friend offers her a go, and she thinks that saying no will make her look childish. She tries it. Over several months she starts to vape on her own as well.
Applying the explanation:
The genetic explanation is about nature: inherited genes make some people more vulnerable. Peer influence is about nurture: the people around us shape what we do.
Inherited. Present from birth. Supported by family and twin studies.
Learned from the people around us. Strongest in adolescence. Supported by surveys of friends' behaviour. Cannot explain why some teenagers with heavy-using friends never become addicted.
Each explanation has gaps that the other can fill. Most psychologists say that nature and nurture work together: genes may make someone more vulnerable, and the peers around them may decide whether they ever try the substance.
Leo is 16. He has never smoked, but his new friends all smoke. They offer him a cigarette and say, "Go on, everyone has one." He takes it and soon smokes every day.
(a) Using the psychological explanation, explain why Leo started smoking. [3 marks]
(b) Give one weakness of peer influence as an explanation of addiction. [2 marks]
(c) Explain one difference between the psychological and the biological explanation of addiction. [2 marks]
(a) Peer influence: his friends all smoke, so Leo sees it as normal and may copy them through modelling (1). They offer him a cigarette, which makes it easy to try (1). They tell him "everyone has one", which is direct pressure to fit in with the group (1).
(b) Many people have friends who use substances and never become addicted (1), so peer influence cannot explain addiction on its own (1). Another correct weakness is that people who already smoke may pick friends who smoke.
(c) The biological explanation says addiction comes from inherited genes, which is nature (1), whereas the psychological explanation says it comes from the people around us, which is nurture (1).
In a "using the psychological explanation" question, each mark is usually one named type of influence linked to a detail from the story, so use the story's words, such as "offer" and "everyone has one".