Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseHave you ever wondered why children from wealthy families often grow up to be wealthy adults, while those from poorer backgrounds typically face more challenges? Sociologists argue that our education system plays a key role in this pattern. This is what we call the reproduction of class inequality - the process by which social class differences are passed from one generation to the next, with schools often serving as the mechanism for this transfer.
Key Definitions:
Marxists see education as serving the needs of capitalism by:
Functionalists argue that education:
Beyond teaching subjects like maths and English, schools teach unspoken lessons about social roles. Working-class students often learn to follow rules and accept authority, while middle and upper-class students may be encouraged to show leadership and creativity. This prepares different classes for their expected future roles in society.
Schools reinforce values like competition, punctuality and respect for authority - qualities needed in the workforce.
Schools reward the formal language patterns more common in middle-class homes, disadvantaging working-class students.
Teachers may have lower expectations of working-class students, leading to a self-fulfilling prophecy.
French sociologist Pierre Bourdieu argued that middle-class families provide their children with cultural capital - knowledge, behaviours and skills that give them an advantage in education. Working-class students often lack this capital, making it harder for them to succeed.
Middle-class students arrive at school already familiar with the types of knowledge, language and behaviour that schools value. Their home environment often includes educational conversations, museum visits and exposure to books - giving them a head start.
In parts of the UK, the 11+ exam determines which students attend grammar schools. Research shows that middle-class parents often pay for private tutoring to help their children pass this exam. In areas with grammar schools, only about 3% of students receiving free school meals (an indicator of disadvantage) attend these schools, compared to around 13% of students overall. This shows how the system can favour those with more resources.
American sociologists Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis proposed that there's a direct correspondence between education and the workplace. Schools mirror the hierarchical structure of work, with:
This prepares students for their future roles in the capitalist economy. Different types of schools prepare students for different types of jobs - elite private schools develop leadership qualities, while state schools in working-class areas may focus more on following instructions.
In his famous study "Learning to Labour" (1977), Paul Willis followed a group of working-class boys (the "lads") in a Birmingham school. He found that they developed an anti-school subculture, rejecting education because they saw it as irrelevant to their future factory jobs.
These boys:
By rejecting education, the "lads" thought they were resisting the system. Ironically, their rebellion actually prepared them for low-skilled, working-class jobs - exactly what the capitalist system needed from them. Their resistance actually ensured they remained in the working class.
Government policies can either reduce or reinforce class inequality in education:
Schools in disadvantaged areas often receive less funding or struggle to attract experienced teachers, creating a cycle of disadvantage.
Middle-class parents can often move to catchment areas with better schools or navigate complex admission systems more effectively.
Academic subjects valued by universities may be less accessible to working-class students or taught less effectively in disadvantaged schools.
In 2020, only 45% of disadvantaged pupils (those eligible for free school meals) in England achieved a pass in GCSE English and maths, compared to 72% of all other pupils. This 27 percentage point gap shows how social class continues to affect educational outcomes despite decades of policy interventions.
While education often reproduces inequality, it can also challenge it. Some approaches include:
Understanding how education reproduces class inequality is the first step toward creating a more equitable system. While schools often maintain existing social structures, they also have the potential to transform society by giving all students - regardless of background - the tools to succeed.
As you study this topic, consider both the structural forces that shape educational outcomes and the ways individuals and groups can resist or challenge these forces. The relationship between education and class is complex, but by examining it critically, we can work toward a system that offers genuine opportunities for all.