Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CoursePaul Willis was a British sociologist who conducted a groundbreaking ethnographic study in the 1970s. His research focused on a group of 12 working-class boys (whom he called "the lads") at a school in the industrial Midlands of England. The findings were published in his famous book "Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs" (1977).
Key Definitions:
Willis spent time with the boys both in and out of school. He observed their behaviour, listened to their conversations and conducted interviews. This allowed him to understand their worldview from the inside. Unlike many previous studies that viewed working-class educational failure as something "done to" pupils, Willis showed how the boys actively participated in their own educational failure.
Willis asked: "Why do working-class kids let themselves get working-class jobs?" He wanted to understand why these boys seemed to willingly accept futures in low-paid, often physically demanding jobs, rather than using education as a means of social mobility.
Willis identified that "the lads" had developed a distinct counter-school culture that rejected the values and authority of the school. This wasn't simply misbehaviour or laziness - it was a coherent alternative value system.
"The lads" rejected school authority through various forms of resistance: skipping classes, disrupting lessons, not completing homework and generally "having a laugh" at the expense of teachers and conformist pupils.
They valued physical toughness, fighting ability and a specific type of working-class masculinity. Academic work was seen as feminine and weak, while manual labour was respected as "real work."
Within their peer group, status came from being funny, tough and streetwise - not from academic achievement. They mocked conformist pupils (whom they called "ear'oles") for following school rules.
Willis argued that "the lads'" counter-school culture contained both "penetrations" (insights into their true situation) and "limitations" (aspects that prevented them from fully understanding their position).
"The lads" had some genuine insights into the education system and their future prospects:
However, their understanding was incomplete in crucial ways:
One powerful moment in Willis's research was when "the lads" visited a local factory. While their teachers expected them to be shocked by the noise, dirt and repetitive nature of the work, the boys were actually excited and impressed. They saw the factory workers as "real men" doing "real work" and could imagine themselves in those roles. This revealed how their counter-school culture had already prepared them to find meaning and identity in manual labour, despite its objective disadvantages.
The central paradox Willis identified was that "the lads'" resistance to school actually prepared them for working-class jobs. By rejecting school authority, they were developing attitudes and behaviours that would help them cope with factory discipline:
In Willis's view, "the lads" weren't simply victims of the system. They actively chose to reject education because their counter-school culture provided them with more immediate status, identity and enjoyment than conforming to school rules. However, this choice ultimately led them to reproduce their working-class position.
The sample was very small (just 12 boys) and not representative of all working-class pupils. Willis's close relationship with "the lads" may have affected his objectivity.
Willis focused exclusively on boys. Later researchers like Angela McRobbie showed that working-class girls had different experiences and forms of resistance.
The study was conducted in the 1970s when manufacturing jobs were still available. The decline of these industries has changed the context for working-class youth.
Despite being conducted over 40 years ago, Willis's work remains relevant to understanding educational inequality today:
Research shows that similar counter-school cultures still exist in many schools, though they may take different forms. The pattern of working-class pupils rejecting education and limiting their opportunities continues.
Willis's work suggests that simply raising aspirations or improving teaching won't address educational inequality if we don't also address the cultural factors that lead some pupils to actively reject education. Schools need to find ways to make learning relevant to working-class identities.
Modern researchers have applied Willis's ideas to contemporary issues like:
Willis's "Learning to Labour" transformed our understanding of educational inequality by showing how working-class pupils can actively participate in reproducing their class position. Rather than simply being failed by the system, "the lads" Willis studied were making choices that made sense within their cultural context but ultimately limited their opportunities.
The study reminds us that educational inequality isn't just about resources or teaching quality - it's also about how education interacts with identity, culture and the wider economic system. Addressing these deeper issues remains a challenge for education policy today.