« Back to Menu πŸ”’ Test Your Knowledge!

Social Construction of Crime and Deviance Β» Structural Theories of Crime

What you'll learn this session

Study time: 30 minutes

  • The key structural theories of crime and deviance
  • Marxist perspectives on crime
  • Functionalist approaches to understanding crime
  • How social structures influence criminal behaviour
  • Real-world examples and case studies of structural theories in action
  • Critical evaluation of different structural approaches

πŸ”’ Unlock Full Course Content

Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!

Unlock This Course

Introduction to Structural Theories of Crime

Structural theories look at how society itself creates conditions that lead to crime and deviance. Unlike theories that focus on individual choices, structural theories examine how social forces like poverty, inequality and power imbalances influence criminal behaviour. These theories suggest that to understand crime, we need to look at the bigger picture of how society is organised.

Key Definitions:

  • Structural theories: Approaches that explain crime and deviance as products of social structures and institutions rather than individual choices.
  • Social structure: The organised pattern of social relationships and institutions that together make up society.
  • Deviance: Behaviour that breaks social norms and rules.
  • Crime: Acts that break laws and are punishable by the state.

📝 Why Structural Theories Matter

Structural theories help us understand why crime rates differ between different areas and social groups. They explain why some neighbourhoods have higher crime rates than others and why certain groups might be more likely to commit certain types of crime. These theories suggest that to reduce crime, we need to address underlying social problems like inequality and lack of opportunity.

🔬 Different from Individual Theories

While individual theories focus on personal choices, psychology or biology, structural theories look at the social environment. They don't ask "what's wrong with the criminal?" but instead ask "what's wrong with society that creates crime?" This shift in focus has major implications for how we might try to prevent crime.

Marxist Theories of Crime

Marxist theories see crime as a product of capitalism and class inequality. They argue that the economic system creates conditions that lead to criminal behaviour and shapes how laws are made and enforced.

Key Marxist Ideas About Crime

Karl Marx didn't write much specifically about crime, but later Marxist thinkers developed theories based on his ideas about capitalism and class conflict. These theories suggest that:

💵 Capitalism Creates Crime

The competitive, profit-driven nature of capitalism encourages selfishness and greed. People learn that success means having material wealth, but not everyone has fair access to legitimate ways of achieving this.

👤👥 Laws Protect the Powerful

Laws are created by the ruling class to protect their interests. Activities that threaten the wealth and power of the elite are criminalised, while harmful actions by the powerful (like exploitation) often aren't illegal.

🕵 Selective Enforcement

The criminal justice system focuses more on crimes typically committed by working-class people (like theft) than on crimes committed by the wealthy (like tax evasion or corporate fraud).

Case Study Focus: White-Collar Crime

The 2008 financial crisis was caused partly by risky and sometimes fraudulent practices in the banking industry. Despite the enormous harm caused (millions lost their homes and jobs), very few bankers faced criminal charges. Marxists would argue this shows how the law protects powerful interests. While someone stealing Β£100 might go to prison, bankers who caused billions in damages often faced only fines or no consequences at all.

Functionalist Theories of Crime

Functionalist theories see society as a system of interconnected parts working together. From this perspective, crime and deviance, surprisingly, can serve useful functions for society.

Durkheim's Views on Crime

Γ‰mile Durkheim, a founding figure in sociology, argued that crime is normal and even necessary in society. His key ideas include:

  • Boundary maintenance: Crime helps define moral boundaries by showing what behaviour is unacceptable.
  • Social solidarity: Public reactions to crime (like outrage) bring people together and reinforce shared values.
  • Social change: Today's deviance can become tomorrow's normality (like how homosexuality was once criminalised but is now accepted).

Durkheim believed crime only becomes problematic when rates are unusually high, which he linked to a state he called "anomie" – when society's norms break down during periods of rapid social change.

Merton's Strain Theory

Robert Merton developed strain theory to explain why crime rates are higher in some parts of society than others. He argued that crime results from a gap between culturally approved goals (like material success) and the limited legitimate means available to achieve them.

When people can't achieve success through approved channels like education and jobs, they may respond in different ways:

💰 Innovation

Accepting society's goals but using illegitimate means to achieve them – like selling drugs to get money.

🏁 Retreatism

Rejecting both goals and means – like dropping out of society through drug addiction or homelessness.

👊 Rebellion

Rejecting existing goals and means and trying to create new ones – like political activism against capitalism.

🙏 Ritualism

Giving up on success but still following the rules – like working in a dead-end job without hope of advancement.

Case Study Focus: Gang Crime in Deprived Areas

In many UK cities, gang involvement is highest in areas with limited economic opportunities. Using Merton's theory, we can see gang membership as "innovation" – young people accept the goal of material success but use illegitimate means (like drug dealing) to achieve it when legitimate paths seem blocked. A 2019 study in Glasgow found that areas with the highest youth unemployment also had the highest rates of gang activity.

Critical Evaluation of Structural Theories

Strengths of Structural Approaches

  • They explain patterns of crime across different social groups and areas.
  • They connect crime to wider social issues like inequality and poverty.
  • They challenge the idea that criminals are just "bad people" and look at social causes.
  • They suggest broader social solutions rather than just punishing individuals.

Limitations and Criticisms

  • They may downplay individual choice and responsibility.
  • Not all people in difficult circumstances turn to crime, suggesting other factors are involved.
  • Marxist theories can be seen as too political and one-sided.
  • Some critics argue these theories excuse criminal behaviour.
  • They don't always explain why specific individuals commit crimes while others in similar situations don't.

Comparing Structural Theories

Marxist Perspective

Key idea: Crime results from capitalism and class inequality.

View of law: Laws protect the powerful and control the working class.

Solution to crime: Fundamental change to economic system.

🛠 Functionalist Perspective

Key idea: Crime serves functions in society and results from strain between goals and means.

View of law: Laws reflect collective values and maintain social order.

Solution to crime: Better balance between cultural goals and available opportunities.

Applying Structural Theories Today

Structural theories remain relevant for understanding contemporary crime issues:

  • The link between austerity policies, poverty and rising crime rates
  • How economic inequality might drive property crime
  • The relationship between youth unemployment and gang involvement
  • Why corporate crime often receives less severe punishment than street crime
  • How social exclusion contributes to higher crime rates in certain communities

Exam Tip

When writing about structural theories in exams, make sure to:

  • Compare different structural approaches (Marxist vs Functionalist)
  • Use specific examples and case studies to illustrate theories
  • Consider both strengths and limitations of structural explanations
  • Link theories to contemporary crime issues in the UK
πŸ”’ Test Your Knowledge!
Chat to Sociology tutor