Introduction to Functionalist Perspectives on Crime
Functionalism is one of the major theoretical perspectives in sociology that views society as a complex system of interconnected parts working together to maintain stability. When it comes to crime and deviance, functionalists have some surprising views that might seem counterintuitive at first!
Key Definitions:
- Functionalism: A theoretical perspective that sees society as a system of interconnected parts that work together to maintain social order.
- Crime: Behaviour that breaks laws established by a society.
- Deviance: Behaviour that goes against social norms but may not necessarily be illegal.
- Social control: The methods used by society to maintain conformity to norms and rules.
💡 Why Study Functionalist Views?
Functionalists offer a unique perspective by suggesting that crime and deviance, while seemingly negative, actually serve important functions in society. This helps us understand why no society has ever been crime-free and why certain levels of deviance might actually be necessary for social progress!
📖 Key Thinkers
The main functionalist thinkers on crime and deviance include Émile Durkheim, Robert Merton, Albert Cohen and Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin. Each developed theories explaining how crime relates to social structure and cultural expectations.
Durkheim: Crime as Normal and Functional
Émile Durkheim (1858-1917) was one of the founding figures of sociology and made significant contributions to our understanding of crime and deviance.
Key Idea: Crime is Normal
Durkheim argued that crime is normal and inevitable in all societies. He believed a society without crime is impossible because not everyone can be equally committed to collective values and moral beliefs.
The Functions of Crime According to Durkheim
💳 Boundary Maintenance
Crime helps define moral boundaries. When someone breaks a rule and is punished, it reinforces what behaviour is acceptable in society.
👥 Social Solidarity
Public reactions to crime (like outrage in the media) bring people together, creating a sense of unity against those who break society's rules.
🚀 Social Change
Today's deviance can become tomorrow's morality. People who challenge existing norms (like early civil rights activists) may eventually change society for the better.
Durkheim also introduced the concept of anomie - a state of normlessness that occurs during periods of rapid social change when traditional norms break down and people become uncertain about society's expectations.
Merton's Strain Theory
Robert Merton (1910-2003) developed Strain Theory to explain how social structure might pressure citizens toward deviant behaviour.
Merton argued that deviance results from a gap between:
- Culturally approved goals (like wealth and success in American society)
- Legitimate means to achieve these goals (education, hard work, etc.)
When people can't achieve cultural goals through legitimate means, they experience "strain" and may respond in different ways:
📝 Merton's Adaptations to Strain
Response |
Cultural Goals |
Legitimate Means |
Example |
Conformity |
Accept |
Accept |
Working hard at school and in a job to achieve success |
Innovation |
Accept |
Reject |
Wanting wealth but turning to crime to get it (e.g., drug dealing) |
Ritualism |
Reject |
Accept |
Following rules without believing success is possible |
Retreatism |
Reject |
Reject |
Dropping out of society (e.g., drug addicts, homeless by choice) |
Rebellion |
Replace |
Replace |
Creating alternative goals and means (e.g., political activists) |
Case Study Focus: Innovation and Crime
In the UK, young people from disadvantaged backgrounds may face limited legitimate opportunities for success. According to Merton, some might turn to "innovation" - accepting the goal of financial success but using illegitimate means to achieve it. This helps explain why certain types of crime (like drug dealing or theft) might be higher in areas with fewer economic opportunities.
Cohen's Status Frustration Theory
Albert Cohen built on Merton's work but focused specifically on working-class boys and juvenile delinquency. He argued that:
- Working-class boys are judged by middle-class standards in school (politeness, delayed gratification, academic achievement)
- Many working-class boys lack the cultural capital to succeed by these standards
- This creates status frustration - feelings of inadequacy and resentment
- In response, they form delinquent subcultures with inverted values
👊 Characteristics of Delinquent Subcultures
According to Cohen, delinquent subcultures are characterised by:
- Non-utilitarian crime - stealing for fun rather than need
- Malicious - vandalism and destruction for its own sake
- Negativistic - deliberately opposing mainstream values
- Short-term hedonism - immediate gratification over long-term goals
- Group loyalty - strong bonds within the delinquent group
Cloward and Ohlin: Differential Opportunity Theory
Richard Cloward and Lloyd Ohlin combined Merton's strain theory with the concept of differential association (the idea that criminal behaviour is learned through interaction with others).
They argued that access to both legitimate and illegitimate opportunities varies by social location. When legitimate opportunities are blocked, the type of delinquent subculture that emerges depends on what illegitimate opportunities are available:
💵 Criminal Subculture
Forms in stable areas with organised adult crime networks. Young people can "apprentice" in criminal careers (e.g., drug dealing, theft rings).
💥 Conflict Subculture
Emerges in unstable areas with few legitimate or illegitimate opportunities. Status comes through violence and gang warfare.
💉 Retreatist Subculture
Develops among those who fail at both legitimate paths and criminal/conflict paths. Involves escape through drug use.
Evaluating Functionalist Perspectives on Crime
✅ Strengths
- Explains why crime exists in all societies
- Recognises the relationship between social structure and crime
- Highlights how inequality and limited opportunities contribute to crime
- Explains different types of criminal and deviant behaviour
- Acknowledges that crime can sometimes lead to positive social change
❌ Limitations
- Overly deterministic - suggests people have little free choice
- Ignores the role of powerful groups in defining what counts as crime
- Focuses mainly on working-class crime, neglecting white-collar and corporate crime
- Doesn't adequately explain female crime patterns
- Assumes too much consensus about societal goals and values
Exam Tip!
When writing about functionalist perspectives, make sure you can compare them with other theoretical approaches like Marxism, interactionism and realism. For high marks, you need to evaluate these theories critically, using evidence and examples to support your points.
Summary: Key Points to Remember
- Functionalists see crime as normal and potentially functional for society
- Durkheim identified boundary maintenance, social solidarity and social change as positive functions of crime
- Merton's Strain Theory explains deviance as a response to the gap between cultural goals and legitimate means
- Cohen focused on status frustration and the formation of delinquent subcultures among working-class boys
- Cloward and Ohlin's Differential Opportunity Theory explains how different types of delinquent subcultures form based on available opportunities
- While functionalist perspectives provide valuable insights, they have limitations in explaining all aspects of crime and deviance