👤 Formal Social Control
Community sanctions are a form of formal social control. This means they are official punishments given by authorities like courts and the police. They aim to enforce laws and maintain order in society.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseCommunity sanctions are punishments given to offenders that allow them to remain in the community rather than going to prison. They're a key part of the criminal justice system and represent an important form of social control that aims to both punish and rehabilitate offenders.
Key Definitions:
Community sanctions are a form of formal social control. This means they are official punishments given by authorities like courts and the police. They aim to enforce laws and maintain order in society.
This contrasts with informal social control, which includes things like disapproval from family or friends. Community sanctions often work alongside informal controls, as offenders remain in their communities where they face social judgement.
The UK has developed a range of community sanctions to deal with different types of offenders and offences. Each has specific aims and requirements:
Offenders must complete unpaid work in the community, such as removing graffiti, clearing wasteland, or decorating public buildings. This is visible to the public and aims to 'pay back' for crimes committed.
These address specific offending behaviours, such as anger management courses, drug and alcohol treatment, or educational programmes to improve employment prospects.
Offenders must stay at a specific address during certain hours, often enforced using electronic tags that alert authorities if they break the rules.
Regular meetings with a probation officer to monitor behaviour and provide support with issues like housing, employment and addiction.
Bans from entering specific areas where offences were committed, such as town centres, shopping areas or football grounds.
Prison sentences that are 'suspended' (not carried out) as long as the offender complies with certain conditions and doesn't reoffend.
The effectiveness of community sanctions is often measured by looking at reoffending rates (recidivism) and comparing them to prison sentences. Research shows mixed results, but there are several key advantages and disadvantages:
Community sanctions often incorporate elements of restorative justice, which focuses on repairing harm rather than just punishing offenders. This approach brings together victims, offenders and community members to address the impact of crime.
Facilitated meetings between victims and offenders allow victims to explain the impact of the crime and offenders to apologise and make amends. This can be part of a community sanction and helps offenders understand the consequences of their actions.
Young offenders can be required to repair the damage they've caused, either directly to the victim or through community service. This helps them take responsibility for their actions while giving something back to those affected.
Youth Offending Teams (YOTs) in the UK work with young people aged 10-17 who get into trouble with the law. They use a range of community sanctions tailored to young offenders:
Example: In 2019, a 15-year-old boy in Manchester who vandalised a community centre was given a Referral Order. Rather than receiving a criminal record, he had to help repair the damage, attend an anti-social behaviour programme and meet with those affected. The community centre reported that he later became a volunteer there, showing how community sanctions can transform relationships and behaviour.
Different sociological perspectives have varying views on the role and effectiveness of community sanctions:
Functionalists see community sanctions as helping to reintegrate offenders into society and maintain social order. They view them as serving the function of both punishment and rehabilitation, helping offenders learn to conform to society's norms.
Marxists might argue that community sanctions are applied differently to working-class and middle-class offenders, reflecting wider inequalities. They might see them as a cost-saving measure rather than a genuine attempt at rehabilitation.
Interactionists focus on how community sanctions might label offenders and affect their self-identity. They're interested in how sanctions might either reinforce or help change an offender's view of themselves.
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly affected community sanctions in the UK. With social distancing requirements, many face-to-face probation meetings moved online and community payback schemes were suspended. This created both challenges and opportunities:
This case highlights how community sanctions must adapt to changing social conditions and raises questions about the importance of in-person contact for effective rehabilitation and monitoring.
Community sanctions continue to evolve, with several trends shaping their future development:
As society's understanding of crime and punishment evolves, community sanctions are likely to play an increasingly important role in the criminal justice system, balancing punishment, public protection and rehabilitation in ways that prison sentences often cannot.