Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseCrime is not just something that happens in society – it's something we talk about, worry about and debate constantly. How we understand crime is shaped by many voices: the media, politicians, police, victims and everyday conversations. These public debates influence how we view criminals, what laws get passed and even how safe we feel walking home at night.
Key Definitions:
The media plays a massive role in shaping how we think about crime. Most people don't experience serious crime directly, so their understanding comes from what they see on TV, read in newspapers, or scroll through online.
Crime stories often follow the principle "if it bleeds, it leads" – violent and unusual crimes get the most coverage. Studies show that murder and violent crimes are massively over-represented compared to how often they actually happen. Meanwhile, white-collar crimes like fraud, which affect many more people, receive much less attention.
Crime dramas, documentaries and true crime podcasts shape our understanding too. They often focus on detective work and catching criminals, creating the impression that most crimes are solved. In reality, many crimes go unsolved or unreported. These shows can also reinforce stereotypes about who commits crimes and why.
Sociologist Stanley Cohen introduced the concept of 'moral panics' in the 1970s when studying reactions to youth subcultures. A moral panic occurs when a person, group or issue is defined as a threat to social values, presented in a simplified way by mass media, leading to public concern and demands for greater social control.
In the 1960s, minor scuffles between youth groups at English seaside resorts were portrayed by the media as evidence of a breakdown in social order. Cohen showed how media exaggeration turned relatively minor incidents into a national moral panic about youth behaviour. This led to increased policing and tougher sentencing for young people involved in even minor disturbances.
Modern moral panics about crime have included concerns about:
There's often a gap between what the statistics say about crime and what the public believes. In the UK, crime has generally been falling since the mid-1990s according to both police records and the Crime Survey for England and Wales. Yet many people believe crime is constantly rising.
Collected by police and government agencies. Limited by what gets reported and recorded.
Ask people directly about their experiences of crime. Can capture unreported crimes but rely on memory and honesty.
Often influenced more by media coverage and personal fears than by actual statistics.
Crime is a hot political topic. Politicians often use tough stances on crime to win votes, with slogans like "tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime". This can lead to policies designed to look good rather than actually reduce crime.
Often focus on social causes of crime like inequality, poverty and lack of opportunity. Tend to emphasise rehabilitation and addressing root causes.
Often emphasise individual responsibility and the need for deterrence. Tend to focus on stronger policing, longer sentences and more prisons.
Social media has transformed public debates about crime in several important ways:
The Black Lives Matter movement gained global momentum after videos of police violence against Black Americans were shared widely on social media. This demonstrates how social media can bring attention to crimes that might otherwise receive little coverage and how it can mobilise public opinion to demand change in the criminal justice system.
Public debates about crime don't just reflect society's concerns – they actively shape how we respond to crime. Here are some ways this happens:
Public outrage following high-profile cases often leads to new laws. For example, "Sarah's Law" in the UK (allowing parents to check if someone has child sex offences) followed the murder of Sarah Payne in 2000.
Public concerns influence what police focus on. If knife crime dominates headlines, resources may be directed there, potentially at the expense of less visible crimes.
When studying public debates about crime, sociologists encourage us to ask critical questions:
By asking these questions, we can develop a more nuanced understanding of crime beyond the headlines and become more informed participants in these important public debates.