โ๏ธ Retribution
The idea that criminals deserve to be punished for their actions. This is sometimes called "just deserts" - the punishment should fit the crime. Retribution focuses on the past crime rather than future outcomes.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseWhen someone is found guilty of a crime, what should happen to them? This question sits at the heart of sentencing debates. Society must balance justice, public safety, rehabilitation and resources when deciding how to punish offenders. Different perspectives on sentencing reflect deeper values about what we believe the purpose of punishment should be.
Key Definitions:
Sentencing is guided by several different aims, which sometimes conflict with each other. Understanding these aims helps explain why sentencing can be so controversial.
The idea that criminals deserve to be punished for their actions. This is sometimes called "just deserts" - the punishment should fit the crime. Retribution focuses on the past crime rather than future outcomes.
Protecting the public by removing dangerous offenders from society. This aim prioritises public safety through incapacitation of offenders, typically through imprisonment.
Using punishment to discourage people from committing crimes. This includes both specific deterrence (stopping the individual from reoffending) and general deterrence (discouraging others in society).
Helping offenders address the causes of their criminal behaviour and reintegrate into society. This focuses on reducing reoffending through education, treatment and support.
Making amends to victims or the wider community for harm caused. This might involve compensation, community service, or restorative justice approaches.
Expressing society's disapproval of criminal behaviour. Punishment sends a message about what society considers unacceptable.
The UK criminal justice system has a range of sentencing options available to judges and magistrates. Each type of sentence aims to address different offences and offenders.
Prison is the most severe punishment in the UK criminal justice system (since capital punishment was abolished). However, there are ongoing debates about when prison should be used and whether it's effective.
Norway has one of the lowest reoffending rates in the world at about 20% (compared to around 48% in the UK). Norwegian prisons focus heavily on rehabilitation and preparing inmates for life after release. Halden Prison, often called the world's most humane prison, has comfortable cells, vocational training and a strong emphasis on maintaining human dignity. Critics argue this approach is too soft, while supporters point to the low reoffending rates as evidence of success.
Many sociologists and criminologists argue that alternatives to prison can be more effective for certain types of offenders, particularly those who commit non-violent crimes.
Restorative justice brings together offenders and victims to discuss the impact of the crime and how harm can be repaired. This approach focuses on healing relationships rather than just punishing offenders.
Community sentences allow offenders to serve their punishment while remaining in the community. These can include unpaid work, curfews, treatment programmes and supervision.
Community Payback (unpaid work in the community) requires offenders to complete between 40 and 300 hours of work on projects like clearing litter, removing graffiti, or renovating community buildings. Research by the Ministry of Justice found that offenders who completed Community Payback had lower reoffending rates than similar offenders who received short prison sentences. The visible nature of the work also helps communities see justice being done.
Research has consistently shown disparities in sentencing based on factors like ethnicity, gender and social class. For example, in the UK, Black people are more likely to receive custodial sentences than White people for similar offences.
These disparities raise important questions about fairness and equality in the criminal justice system. Some argue that sentencing guidelines should be stricter to reduce the potential for bias, while others suggest that judges need flexibility to consider individual circumstances.
Public attitudes toward crime and punishment significantly influence sentencing policy. Politicians often respond to public concerns about crime with "tough on crime" approaches, even when evidence suggests these may not be the most effective.
However, research shows that when given detailed information about specific cases, the public often supports more rehabilitative approaches than might be expected. This suggests that the relationship between public opinion and effective sentencing policy is complex.
Most criminologists now argue for a balanced approach to sentencing that considers:
The debate around sentencing reflects broader societal values about justice, rehabilitation and the purpose of punishment. As our understanding of what works in reducing crime develops, sentencing approaches continue to evolve.