Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CoursePre-industrial families (before the Industrial Revolution of the 18th-19th centuries) had very different structures and relationships compared to modern families. These families were shaped by economic necessity, religious beliefs and survival needs in a world without modern technology, healthcare, or social welfare systems.
Key Definitions:
Pre-industrial families often functioned as economic units where all members contributed to survival. The household was both a place to live and a workplace. Family boundaries were less clear than today, with servants, apprentices and lodgers often considered part of the household. Many families lived in small, cramped homes with limited privacy, which affected how family members interacted with each other.
Unlike modern families that primarily consume goods, pre-industrial families were units of production. Family members worked together in farming, crafts, or cottage industries. Children were valued as economic assets who could contribute to family income from a young age. The family was the main provider of welfare, healthcare, education and elder care in the absence of state provisions.
Pre-industrial families were strongly patriarchal, with clear hierarchies based on gender and age. The father's authority was reinforced by religious teachings, legal systems and economic realities.
The father was the undisputed head of the household with legal authority over his wife and children. He controlled family property and made major decisions. His authority was supported by religious teachings that emphasised male leadership and female submission. Legal systems gave husbands rights over their wives' property and bodies, with few protections for women or children against abuse of this power.
The father was the main breadwinner, disciplinarian and decision-maker. He represented the family in the community and was responsible for teaching sons his trade or occupation.
Women managed the household, cared for children and often contributed to family income through activities like spinning, weaving, or helping with farming. They had significant practical authority in domestic matters but limited formal power.
Children were expected to be obedient and contribute to family work from a young age. They had few rights and were subject to strict discipline, including physical punishment.
The Brown family lives in rural England in 1700. Their day begins before dawn, with all family members rising to start their work. Father John manages their small farm and makes decisions about crops and livestock. Mother Mary oversees the household, prepares meals, tends the vegetable garden, makes cheese and spins wool. Their 12-year-old son Thomas helps his father with farming tasks, while 10-year-old daughter Sarah assists her mother and cares for the younger children. Even 6-year-old William has chores, feeding chickens and collecting eggs. The family works together as an economic unit, producing most of what they need to survive. Their relationships are shaped by work roles, with little time for leisure or education. The father's word is law, backed by religious teaching that emphasises his God-given authority.
Marriage in pre-industrial times was primarily an economic arrangement rather than a romantic partnership. Marriages were often arranged or strongly influenced by parents, with economic considerations taking priority over personal feelings.
Marriages were strategic alliances between families that could bring economic benefits through dowries, land, or business connections. For the working classes, a spouse's ability to work and contribute economically was crucial. Love was considered a bonus rather than a requirement, though evidence suggests many couples did develop affection over time.
Husbands and wives had clearly defined separate roles but worked together as an economic team. While wives were legally subordinate, many had significant influence in practice, especially in their areas of responsibility. The relationship was based more on mutual dependence and shared work than on emotional intimacy as we understand it today.
The experience of childhood was vastly different in pre-industrial times compared to today. High infant and child mortality rates affected how parents viewed and related to their children.
Children were not seen as a separate category requiring special treatment as they are today. They were viewed as 'little adults' who needed to be trained for adult work roles as quickly as possible. Childhood was brief, with children taking on adult responsibilities from around age 7. Many children from poor families were sent away as servants or apprentices from a young age.
Historian Philippe Ariès argued in his influential work "Centuries of Childhood" (1960) that the concept of childhood as a special phase of life didn't exist in pre-industrial Europe. He pointed to evidence such as the way children were depicted in art (as miniature adults), the absence of children's clothing or toys and the early age at which children entered the workforce. While some of his conclusions have been challenged by later historians, his work highlighted how differently childhood was understood before the modern era.
While there were common patterns, family relationships varied significantly based on social class, occupation and region.
Wealthy families often had distant parent-child relationships, with children raised by nurses and governesses. Marriages were strategic alliances to preserve wealth and status. Family life was formal, with strict rules of etiquette governing interactions.
Families of urban craftsmen often integrated work and home life, with the household serving as both workshop and living space. Children learned trades from parents through apprenticeship. Women often had important roles in family businesses.
Agricultural families typically involved all members in farm work, with tasks divided by gender and age. Family size was often larger to provide necessary labour. Seasonal work patterns shaped family routines and relationships.
Religion played a central role in shaping family relationships in pre-industrial times. Religious teachings reinforced patriarchal authority and defined moral expectations for family members.
Christian teachings emphasised the father's role as head of the household, modelled on God's authority. The Bible was used to justify male authority and female submission. Religious rituals and practices structured family life, with prayer, Bible reading and church attendance being important shared activities. Religious education was a key parental responsibility, with mothers often teaching children basic prayers and moral lessons.
While modern families differ greatly from pre-industrial ones, some aspects of these historical family patterns continue to influence contemporary family life and expectations.
Some traditional gender roles in families have roots in pre-industrial patterns. The idea of the father as provider and mother as nurturer, though modified, still influences many families. Extended family networks remain important for support in many communities, especially during economic hardship. Religious teachings about family roles continue to shape some families' structures and relationships.
The economic function of families has shifted dramatically from production to consumption. Children are now valued for emotional rather than economic reasons. Power relationships have become more equal between spouses and between parents and children. The state has taken over many functions previously managed by families, such as education, healthcare and elder care.
Consider how your family life differs from that of a pre-industrial family. What aspects of family relationships have changed the most? Are there any ways in which your family resembles pre-industrial patterns? How might these changes affect people's experiences of family life and their expectations of family relationships?