🏢 One or a dominant firm
One firm supplies the whole market, or one firm is so large that the others hardly matter.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseImagine a small island with one company that supplies all of its electricity. Customers cannot switch to a rival, because there is no rival. Whatever that company decides, customers have to accept. This is the opposite of the busy noodle market in Competitive Markets.
You met monopoly briefly in Public Goods, Merit Goods, Demerit Goods and Monopoly, where it was a cause of market failure. In this lesson we look at monopoly as a type of market, and at what it means for consumers and for the firm.
Key terms:
A monopoly market usually has these characteristics:
One firm supplies the whole market, or one firm is so large that the others hardly matter.
It is very hard or very costly for new firms to join the market, so the monopoly is protected from competition.
With no close rivals, the firm can choose its own price. It does not have to follow what other firms charge.
The product is different from anything else on sale, so customers cannot easily switch to a substitute.
Barriers to entry are what keep a monopoly in place. Here are some examples:
With only one firm, the usual pressure from rivals disappears. This changes how the firm behaves.
Here is a made-up example. In the country of Zandria, only one firm, Zandria Rail, runs trains between the two biggest cities. The table compares it with the same route if ten firms ran trains.
| One firm (monopoly) | Ten firms (competitive) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price of a ticket | $40 | $25 |
| Train services each day (all firms together) | 6 | 20 |
| Profit for each firm | High | Lower |
The monopoly charges more per ticket, but passengers pay more and have fewer trains to choose from.
Economies of scale: a very large firm has low average costs, and it may pass some of the saving on in lower prices.
Money for research: high profits can be spent on R&D, leading to new and better products.
Natural monopoly: where costs of setting up are huge, one firm can supply everyone more cheaply than many small firms could.
Higher prices: the firm can charge more than it could in a competitive market.
Less choice: consumers have only one supplier.
Poorer quality: without rivals, there is less reason to improve.
Inefficiency: with no pressure to keep costs low, the firm may waste resources and keep costs higher than necessary.
Notice that a monopoly does not always have to be bad. A natural monopoly, such as a firm supplying water through one set of pipes, can be sensible. Governments often watch these firms closely. You will meet ways to do this in Regulation and Direct Provision.
1. Thinking a monopoly must be the only firm. A dominant firm with a very large share can also be a monopoly in the exam.
2. Saying that a monopoly always charges high prices. It is better to say it can charge higher prices, because it is a price maker.
3. Only giving disadvantages. Questions that ask you to discuss need advantages too, such as economies of scale and money for research.
4. Listing a characteristic without linking it to an effect. For example, say "high barriers to entry, so no new firms can compete, so the firm can keep prices high".
Velmara is a made-up country. Only one company, Velmara Water, supplies water to homes. It would cost billions of dollars to build a second set of water pipes, and the government has given the company the only licence to supply water. The company says that its large size lets it keep costs low and spend money on improving its pipes.
(a) Identify two barriers to entry in the water market in Velmara. [2 marks]
(b) Explain how having only one firm may affect the price and the quality of water. [4 marks]
(c) Discuss whether a monopoly is good for consumers in Velmara. [6 marks]
(a) High start-up costs, because a second set of pipes would cost billions of dollars (1). Legal protection, because the government has given the company the only licence (1).
(b) Price: with no rivals, the company is a price maker (1), so it can charge higher prices than in a competitive market (1). Quality: with no competition, customers cannot switch (1), so there is less reason for the firm to improve its quality (1).
(c) For consumers, it may be good because the company has economies of scale, so its costs are low and it may pass on lower prices (1). It can also spend its profit on improving pipes (1). Because the market is a natural monopoly, one set of pipes is cheaper than several (1). However, consumers have no choice of supplier (1), and may pay higher prices and get poorer quality (1). Overall, it depends on whether the company passes on its lower costs and keeps improving, or uses its power to charge high prices (1).
In part (c), use the information given in the question, such as the cost of pipes and the licence. Give one paragraph for each side and end with a short judgement.