🧠 Test Your Knowledge!
Managing Atmospheric Pollution » Flue-gas Desulfurisation
What you'll learn this session
Study time: 30 minutes
- What flue-gas desulfurisation (FGD) is and why it's important
- Different methods of removing sulfur dioxide from power plant emissions
- How wet scrubber systems work in detail
- The environmental benefits and challenges of FGD
- Real-world examples of FGD implementation
- Economic considerations and efficiency of FGD systems
Introduction to Flue-gas Desulfurisation
When we burn fossil fuels like coal and oil in power stations, they release harmful gases into the atmosphere. One of the most problematic is sulfur dioxide (SO2), which causes acid rain, damages buildings, harms plants and can make breathing difficult for people. Flue-gas desulfurisation (FGD) is a technology that removes sulfur dioxide from the exhaust gases (flue gases) of power plants before they're released into the air.
Key Definitions:
- Flue-gas desulfurisation (FGD): A set of technologies used to remove sulfur dioxide from exhaust flue gases of fossil-fuel power plants.
- Scrubber: A pollution control device that uses a liquid to wash unwanted pollutants from a gas stream.
- Sorbent: A material used to absorb or adsorb liquids or gases.
- Slurry: A semi-liquid mixture, typically of fine particles suspended in water.
💡 Why Remove Sulfur Dioxide?
Sulfur dioxide contributes to several environmental problems:
- Forms acid rain when it combines with water in the atmosphere
- Damages forests, crops and aquatic ecosystems
- Corrodes buildings and monuments
- Causes respiratory problems in humans
- Reduces visibility (creates haze)
🌎 Global Impact
Before FGD technologies became widespread, power plants were major contributors to acid rain. In the 1970s and 1980s, acid rain damaged forests across Europe and North America. Today, countries with strict emissions controls have seen dramatic reductions in sulfur dioxide emissions and acid rain damage.
How Flue-gas Desulfurisation Works
There are several methods to remove sulfur dioxide from flue gases, but they fall into two main categories: wet scrubbers and dry scrubbers. Let's look at how each works.
Wet Scrubber Systems
Wet scrubbers are the most common type of FGD system. They use a liquid slurry to remove sulfur dioxide from flue gases.
📈 Efficiency
Wet scrubbers can remove 90-99% of sulfur dioxide from flue gases, making them highly effective.
➕ Advantages
High removal efficiency, can handle high sulfur content fuels and produces useful by-products like gypsum.
➖ Disadvantages
Requires significant water use, creates wastewater that needs treatment and has high installation costs.
The Wet Scrubbing Process
Here's how a typical limestone wet scrubber works:
- Preparation: Limestone (CaCO3) is crushed and mixed with water to form a slurry.
- Contact: Flue gas enters the scrubber and comes into contact with the limestone slurry, which is sprayed from nozzles.
- Chemical Reaction: The sulfur dioxide in the flue gas reacts with the limestone slurry to form calcium sulfite (CaSO3).
- Oxidation: Air is blown into the mixture, which converts calcium sulfite to calcium sulfate (CaSO4), also known as gypsum.
- Collection: The gypsum is separated from the water, dried and can be sold for use in making plasterboard and cement.
- Release: The cleaned flue gas, now with much less sulfur dioxide, is released through the stack.
The chemical reactions involved are:
CaCO3 + SO2 → CaSO3 + CO2
CaSO3 + ½O2 + 2H2O → CaSO4·2H2O (gypsum)
Dry Scrubber Systems
Dry scrubbers use a dry sorbent or a slurry with minimal water to remove sulfur dioxide.
💡 Spray Dry Scrubbers
In this system, a slurry of lime (CaO) is sprayed into the hot flue gas. The water in the slurry evaporates, leaving dry particles that react with SO2. The resulting dry waste is collected in a fabric filter or electrostatic precipitator.
Efficiency: 80-90% SO2 removal
💡 Dry Sorbent Injection
Dry powdered sorbents like lime or sodium bicarbonate are injected directly into the flue gas stream. They react with SO2 and are collected as dry waste.
Efficiency: 50-70% SO2 removal
Environmental Benefits and Challenges
✅ Benefits
- Significant reduction in acid rain
- Improved air quality and visibility
- Protection of ecosystems and buildings
- Creation of useful by-products (gypsum)
- Reduction in respiratory illnesses
⚠ Challenges
- High water consumption (for wet systems)
- Wastewater treatment requirements
- Energy consumption (parasitic load)
- Disposal of waste if not sold as by-product
- High installation and operating costs
Case Study Focus: Drax Power Station, UK
Drax Power Station in North Yorkshire is one of the UK's largest power stations. In the 1990s, it was also one of the largest sources of sulfur dioxide emissions in Europe. Between 2007 and 2010, Drax installed FGD equipment on all six of its generating units.
Results:
- SO2 emissions reduced by over 90%
- The FGD process produces about 15,000 tonnes of gypsum each week
- This gypsum is sold to the construction industry for plasterboard manufacturing
- The project cost approximately £300 million but has significantly reduced environmental impact
Economic Considerations
Installing FGD systems is expensive, but there are economic benefits too:
💰 Costs
- High capital costs for installation
- Ongoing operational costs
- Energy consumption reduces plant efficiency
💲 Benefits
- Sale of gypsum by-product
- Avoided environmental damage costs
- Avoided health costs
📈 Policy Drivers
- Environmental regulations
- Carbon taxes and emissions trading
- Public pressure for cleaner energy
Future Developments
While FGD technology is mature, research continues to improve efficiency and reduce costs:
- Advanced sorbents: New materials that can capture more SO2 with less material
- Multi-pollutant control: Systems that remove SO2, NOx and mercury in a single process
- Reduced water use: New designs that require less water or recycle water more efficiently
- Energy recovery: Systems that capture waste heat from the FGD process
Summary
Flue-gas desulfurisation is a crucial technology for reducing the environmental impact of burning fossil fuels. While it adds cost to electricity generation, the environmental and health benefits are substantial. As countries work to reduce their carbon emissions, many power plants are switching from coal to cleaner fuels, but FGD systems will remain important for those fossil fuel plants that continue to operate during the transition to renewable energy.
Quick Facts
- A typical 500 MW coal-fired power plant without FGD might emit 10,000 tonnes of SO2 per year
- With FGD, this can be reduced to less than 1,000 tonnes
- The UK has reduced its SO2 emissions by over 95% since the 1970s, largely due to FGD and switching to cleaner fuels
- Modern FGD systems can achieve 99% SO2 removal efficiency
- The global market for FGD systems is worth billions of pounds
Log in to track your progress and mark lessons as complete!
Login Now
Don't have an account? Sign up here.