Database results:
    examBoard: Cambridge
    examType: IGCSE
    lessonTitle: Tectonic Hazard Management Strategies
    
Geography - Physical Geography - Tectonic Hazards - Tectonic Hazard Management Strategies - BrainyLemons
« Back to Menu 🧠 Test Your Knowledge!

Tectonic Hazards » Tectonic Hazard Management Strategies

What you'll learn this session

Study time: 30 minutes

  • Different approaches to tectonic hazard management
  • The difference between prediction, protection and preparation strategies
  • How countries of different economic development levels manage hazards
  • Case studies of successful tectonic hazard management
  • How to evaluate the effectiveness of different management strategies

Managing Tectonic Hazards

Tectonic hazards like earthquakes, volcanic eruptions and tsunamis can cause devastating impacts on communities around the world. However, humans have developed various strategies to reduce these impacts and save lives. How we manage these hazards depends on many factors including a country's wealth, technology and previous experiences with disasters.

Key Definitions:

  • Tectonic hazard management: The methods and strategies used to reduce the impacts of tectonic events on people and property.
  • Mitigation: Actions taken to reduce or minimise the effects of a hazard.
  • Adaptation: Adjusting to living with hazards and reducing vulnerability.

The 3 P's of Hazard Management

Tectonic hazard management strategies can be grouped into three main categories, often called the "3 P's":

🔍 Prediction

Strategies that focus on forecasting when and where a tectonic event might occur, giving people time to evacuate or prepare.

  • Monitoring seismic activity
  • Tracking ground deformation
  • Observing changes in gas emissions (volcanoes)
  • Animal behaviour monitoring

🛡 Protection

Physical measures that aim to reduce the impact of a tectonic event when it happens.

  • Earthquake-resistant buildings
  • Tsunami sea walls
  • Lava diversion channels
  • Retrofitting existing structures

💼 Preparation

Planning and education that help communities respond effectively when a disaster strikes.

  • Emergency response plans
  • Public education campaigns
  • Regular drills and exercises
  • Insurance schemes

Economic Development and Hazard Management

A country's level of economic development significantly influences how it manages tectonic hazards. Let's compare the approaches typically used in countries at different development levels:

📈 High-Income Countries (HICs)

Countries like Japan, USA and New Zealand can afford more expensive management strategies:

  • Advanced monitoring technology
  • Strict building codes and enforcement
  • Comprehensive insurance schemes
  • Regular public drills and education
  • Well-funded emergency services

🏢 Low-Income Countries (LICs)

Countries like Nepal, Haiti and parts of Indonesia face more challenges:

  • Limited monitoring equipment
  • Less strict building regulations
  • Focus on low-cost community preparation
  • Greater reliance on international aid
  • Traditional knowledge and warning systems

Prediction Strategies in Detail

Scientists use various methods to predict when and where tectonic events might occur, though exact prediction remains challenging.

🖥 Seismic Monitoring

Networks of seismometers detect ground movements that might indicate an impending earthquake or volcanic eruption. Japan's Early Warning System can give people up to 30 seconds notice before major shaking begins.

🌋 Ground Deformation

GPS and satellite technology measure tiny changes in ground level that might indicate magma movement beneath volcanoes or stress building along fault lines.

Precursor Events

Small earthquakes (foreshocks), changes in groundwater levels, or unusual animal behaviour may sometimes precede major events, though these aren't always reliable indicators.

Protection Strategies in Detail

Physical measures can significantly reduce damage and casualties when tectonic events occur.

Earthquake Protection

Engineers have developed various techniques to make buildings more resistant to earthquake shaking:

🏗 Base Isolation

Buildings are constructed on rubber or spring foundations that absorb seismic waves, preventing them from travelling up through the structure.

🔩 Cross Bracing

Steel supports in an X-pattern strengthen buildings against lateral forces, helping them resist collapse during shaking.

🏭 Retrofitting

Older buildings can be strengthened with additional supports, reinforced walls and flexible connections to improve their earthquake resistance.

Volcanic Protection

Managing volcanic hazards often involves diverting dangerous flows away from populated areas:

💧 Lava Diversion

Channels, barriers and even water cooling can be used to redirect lava flows away from towns and infrastructure. During the 1973 eruption on Heimaey, Iceland, seawater was sprayed onto advancing lava to cool and stop it from blocking the harbour.

🚧 Exclusion Zones

Restricting development in high-risk areas near volcanoes can prevent casualties and property damage. Mount Vesuvius in Italy has a red zone where new building is restricted.

Preparation Strategies in Detail

Being prepared for tectonic events can save lives even when prediction and protection measures fail.

📚 Education

Teaching people how to respond during an event (like "Drop, Cover, Hold" during earthquakes) and raising awareness about evacuation routes and emergency procedures.

🚑 Emergency Planning

Developing detailed response plans, establishing emergency shelters, stockpiling supplies and training emergency services to respond effectively.

📅 Regular Drills

Practising evacuation and emergency procedures regularly helps people respond automatically during the stress of a real event. Japan holds annual earthquake drills on 1 September.

Case Study: Japan's Earthquake Management

Japan experiences about 1,500 earthquakes every year and has developed one of the world's most comprehensive hazard management systems:

  • Prediction: The Japan Meteorological Agency operates an early warning system that can detect earthquakes and issue alerts seconds before shaking begins.
  • Protection: Japan has some of the strictest building codes in the world. After the 1995 Kobe earthquake, these were further strengthened. Many buildings use base isolation and dampers to absorb seismic energy.
  • Preparation: Japanese schoolchildren participate in regular earthquake drills from a young age. The country observes Disaster Prevention Day on 1 September with nationwide drills. Most households keep emergency kits ready.

During the 2011 Tohoku earthquake (magnitude 9.0), these measures saved thousands of lives despite the enormous power of the earthquake and tsunami. The death toll of approximately 20,000 would have been much higher without these strategies.

Case Study: Nepal Earthquake 2015

The 2015 Nepal earthquake (magnitude 7.8) shows the challenges faced by lower-income countries:

  • Prediction: Nepal had limited seismic monitoring equipment and no early warning system.
  • Protection: Building codes existed but were poorly enforced. Many traditional buildings collapsed, while newer structures built to code generally survived.
  • Preparation: Some community-based education programs were in place, but emergency services were underfunded and struggled to respond effectively.

Following the earthquake, which killed nearly 9,000 people, Nepal has worked with international partners to improve its hazard management. This includes better building techniques, community training and improved emergency planning.

Evaluating Management Strategies

When assessing the effectiveness of tectonic hazard management strategies, consider:

  • Cost vs. Benefit: Expensive measures like earthquake-resistant buildings save lives but may be unaffordable in poorer regions.
  • Short-term vs. Long-term: Education and preparation may be more sustainable long-term strategies than technological solutions that require constant maintenance.
  • Cultural Appropriateness: Strategies must be adapted to local cultures and conditions to be effective.
  • Integrated Approach: The most successful management combines all three P's (Prediction, Protection, Preparation) rather than relying on just one approach.

Remember that while we cannot prevent tectonic hazards from occurring, effective management can significantly reduce their impact on communities and save lives.

🧠 Test Your Knowledge!
Chat to Geography tutor