Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseHave you ever noticed how you're more likely to help someone wearing your school uniform than someone from a rival school? Or how football fans will go out of their way to help fellow supporters? This is Social Identity Theory in action! Developed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner in the 1970s, this theory explains how our sense of who we are is shaped by the groups we belong to and how this affects our willingness to help others.
Social Identity Theory suggests that we don't just see ourselves as individuals - we also define ourselves through our group memberships. These groups become part of our identity and we naturally favour people who share our group membership whilst sometimes discriminating against those who don't.
Key Definitions:
We all belong to multiple groups - our family, school, sports teams, friendship groups, nationality and more. Each group contributes to our sense of self. When we identify strongly with a group, we adopt its values, norms and behaviours as our own.
Social Identity Theory breaks down into three key processes that explain how group membership affects our behaviour:
We automatically sort people into groups - "us" and "them". This helps us make sense of the social world but can lead to stereotyping.
We adopt the identity of groups we belong to. Their success becomes our success, their values become our values.
We compare our groups to others to maintain positive self-esteem. We want our groups to be better than theirs.
Here's where it gets really interesting for prosocial behaviour. Our self-esteem is closely tied to how well our groups are doing. When our group succeeds, we feel good about ourselves. When it fails, our self-esteem takes a hit. This creates a powerful motivation to help fellow group members succeed.
Because our self-worth is connected to our group's success, we're naturally motivated to help other group members. Their success reflects well on us, boosting our own self-esteem. This explains why:
In the 1970s, Henri Tajfel conducted groundbreaking experiments where he randomly assigned boys to groups based on trivial criteria (like preferring paintings by Klee or Kandinsky). Even with these meaningless distinctions, boys consistently favoured their own group members when distributing rewards. This showed that even minimal group membership is enough to trigger in-group favouritism and affect prosocial behaviour.
Social Identity Theory helps explain many everyday examples of prosocial behaviour:
Students are more likely to help peers from their own school, house, or year group. School spirit and house competitions tap into this natural tendency to support in-group members.
Football fans will travel hundreds of miles to support their team and help fellow supporters. The stronger their team identity, the more likely they are to engage in prosocial behaviour towards other fans.
During natural disasters or crises, people often show remarkable generosity towards fellow citizens whilst being less responsive to international appeals. This isn't necessarily selfishness - it's Social Identity Theory in action. Our national identity creates a sense of shared fate and mutual responsibility.
For example, during the 2020 pandemic, many countries saw an outpouring of community support - neighbours helping neighbours, volunteers supporting NHS workers and communities rallying around local businesses. This prosocial behaviour was often strongest within clearly defined community groups.
Unfortunately, Social Identity Theory also explains why prosocial behaviour can be selective. The same processes that make us help in-group members can make us less likely to help out-group members, or even actively discriminate against them.
We naturally feel less empathy for out-group members' suffering, making us less likely to offer help.
We may view helping out-group members as taking resources away from our own group.
Negative stereotypes about out-groups can reduce our willingness to help them.
Researchers staged an emergency where a Manchester United fan appeared to be injured. When participants were wearing Manchester United shirts (making their team identity salient), they were much more likely to help the injured fan. However, when the injured person wore a Liverpool shirt (rival team), helping rates dropped dramatically. This study perfectly demonstrates how group membership affects prosocial behaviour in real-world situations.
Several factors determine how strongly group membership affects prosocial behaviour:
The more strongly someone identifies with a group, the more likely they are to help fellow members. Someone who's passionate about their football team will show more in-group favouritism than a casual fan.
Smaller, more distinctive groups often show stronger in-group favouritism. Being part of a rare or unique group can strengthen identity and increase helping behaviour towards fellow members.
When a group's status is threatened, members often increase their prosocial behaviour towards each other whilst becoming more hostile to out-groups. This helps maintain group cohesion and self-esteem.
Like all psychological theories, Social Identity Theory has both strengths and limitations when explaining prosocial behaviour:
Understanding Social Identity Theory can help us promote more prosocial behaviour in various settings:
Schools can create inclusive group identities that encompass all students, reducing bullying and increasing mutual support. House systems and school-wide initiatives can channel group identity positively.
Community leaders can emphasise shared identities and common goals to increase cooperation and mutual aid. Local pride and community events can strengthen prosocial bonds.
Understanding how group membership affects helping can inform policies about integration, community cohesion and social support systems.
Social Identity Theory shows us that prosocial behaviour isn't just about individual personality - it's deeply influenced by our group memberships and the need to maintain positive self-esteem through group success. This understanding can help us create more inclusive communities where group identities promote rather than hinder mutual support and cooperation.