« Back to Course ๐Ÿ”’ Test Your Knowledge!

Craik and Lockharts Levels of Processing Model ยป Structural Processing (Visual Features)

What you'll learn this session

Study time: 30 minutes

  • Understand Craik and Lockhart's Levels of Processing Model
  • Explore structural processing and visual features in detail
  • Learn how shallow processing affects memory retention
  • Examine real-world examples of structural processing
  • Discover the role of visual features in memory formation
  • Analyse case studies demonstrating structural processing

๐Ÿ”’ Unlock Full Course Content

Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!

Unlock This Course

Introduction to Levels of Processing Model

In 1972, Fergus Craik and Robert Lockhart revolutionised how we understand memory. They proposed that memory isn't just about storing information in different boxes (like short-term and long-term memory), but about how deeply we process information. Think of it like this: if you're reading a book, you could focus on the font style (shallow) or the meaning of the story (deep). The deeper you process, the better you remember!

Key Definitions:

  • Levels of Processing: A theory suggesting that memory depends on how deeply information is processed, not just how long it's stored.
  • Structural Processing: The shallowest level of processing, focusing on the physical appearance of information.
  • Visual Features: The physical characteristics we can see, such as colour, shape, size and font.

👁 What is Structural Processing?

Structural processing is like being a detective who only notices what things look like, not what they mean. When you process information structurally, you're focusing on visual features such as whether words are in capital letters, what colour they are, or what font they're written in. It's the most basic level of processing - like noticing someone's wearing a red jumper without thinking about why they chose that colour.

The Three Levels Explained

Craik and Lockhart identified three main levels of processing, each getting progressively deeper and more effective for memory:

👁 Structural (Shallow)

Focuses on physical appearance - colours, shapes, fonts. Like noticing a word is written in bold without reading what it says.

🔊 Phonetic (Medium)

Focuses on sounds - how words sound when spoken. Like noticing two words rhyme with each other.

🧠 Semantic (Deep)

Focuses on meaning - what words actually mean and how they relate to other concepts. Like understanding the story behind the words.

Visual Features in Structural Processing

When we engage in structural processing, we're like art critics examining a painting's technique rather than its emotional impact. Visual features are the building blocks of what we see and our brains are remarkably good at noticing these details quickly.

Types of Visual Features

Our brains automatically detect various visual features when we encounter information. These features include:

  • Colour: Red text vs. blue text, bright vs. dark colours
  • Size: Large fonts vs. small fonts, big images vs. tiny ones
  • Shape: Round letters vs. angular letters, curved vs. straight lines
  • Font Style: Bold, italic, underlined, or regular text
  • Position: Where something appears on a page or screen
  • Brightness: How light or dark something appears

Case Study Focus: The Stroop Effect

A perfect example of structural processing is the famous Stroop Effect. When people see the word "RED" written in blue ink, they struggle to say the colour of the ink quickly. This happens because we automatically process both the visual features (blue colour) and the meaning (the word "red"). The structural processing of the blue colour competes with our deeper processing of the word's meaning, creating interference and slowing us down.

Why Structural Processing Matters

You might wonder why we need to understand structural processing if it's the weakest for memory. Actually, it's incredibly important for several reasons:

Everyday Applications

Structural processing helps us navigate the world quickly and efficiently. Think about these situations:

  • Road Signs: We instantly recognise stop signs by their red colour and octagonal shape, even from a distance
  • Text Messages: We notice when someone writes in ALL CAPS (which feels like shouting)
  • Websites: We spot clickable buttons because they're usually a different colour or have a border
  • School Work: We identify important information when teachers highlight it in yellow

Speed vs. Depth Trade-off

Structural processing is lightning-fast but doesn't create strong memories. It's like skimming the surface of a lake - you cover lots of ground quickly, but you don't go deep. This makes it perfect for quick decisions but poor for long-term learning.

Research Evidence

Craik and Lockhart's original research involved clever experiments that proved their theory. Let's look at some key studies:

The Original Experiment

In their groundbreaking study, participants were shown words and asked different types of questions:

  • Structural Questions: "Is this word written in capital letters?" (focusing on visual appearance)
  • Phonetic Questions: "Does this word rhyme with 'cat'?" (focusing on sound)
  • Semantic Questions: "Does this word fit in the sentence 'The man ate the ___'?" (focusing on meaning)

Later, participants were surprised with a memory test. Those who answered semantic questions remembered far more words than those who answered structural questions. This proved that deeper processing creates stronger memories.

Case Study Focus: Hyde and Jenkins (1973)

These researchers gave students lists of words to study. One group was told to count the number of letters in each word (structural processing), while another group was told to rate how pleasant each word was (semantic processing). Even though both groups spent the same amount of time with the words, the semantic processing group remembered twice as many words in a surprise memory test!

Limitations and Criticisms

While the Levels of Processing model is influential, it's not perfect. Critics have pointed out several issues:

Problems with the Theory

Some psychologists argue that the model has weaknesses:

  • Circular Reasoning: We say deep processing creates better memory, but we define deep processing as whatever creates better memory
  • Individual Differences: Some people are naturally better at visual processing, making structural processing more effective for them
  • Context Matters: Sometimes structural features are actually very important (like in art or design)
  • Measurement Issues: It's hard to measure exactly how "deep" someone's processing really is

Practical Applications

Understanding structural processing can help you in many areas of life:

📚 Study Techniques

Don't just highlight text in pretty colours - that's structural processing! Instead, think about what the highlighted information means.

🎨 Design and Art

Visual features are crucial in design. Understanding how people process colours, shapes and fonts helps create effective posters and websites.

💡 Memory Improvement

If you want to remember something, don't just focus on how it looks - think about what it means and how it connects to other ideas.

Modern Research and Extensions

Since Craik and Lockhart's original work, researchers have continued to explore how visual features affect memory and learning.

Current Understanding

Modern research shows that structural processing isn't always shallow. In some cases, visual features can be processed quite deeply:

  • Expert Knowledge: Art experts can process visual features very deeply, noticing subtle details that others miss
  • Emotional Content: Bright colours or unusual fonts can grab attention and improve memory
  • Personal Relevance: If visual features are personally meaningful, they can be processed more deeply

Case Study Focus: The Picture Superiority Effect

Researchers have found that we remember pictures much better than words - this is called the Picture Superiority Effect. This suggests that visual processing can sometimes be quite powerful for memory, challenging the idea that structural processing is always shallow. When we see a picture of a dog, we process both its visual features (structural) and its meaning (semantic) simultaneously, creating a richer memory trace.

Conclusion

Structural processing and visual features play a crucial role in how we understand and remember information. While Craik and Lockhart showed us that focusing only on visual appearance creates weaker memories than focusing on meaning, visual features are still incredibly important for quick recognition, navigation and initial attention. The key is understanding when to use structural processing (for quick decisions) and when to go deeper (for long-term learning). By recognising how your brain processes visual information, you can become a more effective learner and better understand how memory works in everyday life.

๐Ÿ”’ Test Your Knowledge!
Chat to Psychology tutor