« Back to Course Test Your Knowledge Flash Cards ๐Ÿ”’Play Lemonaire ๐Ÿ”’Play Last Stand

Explaining Crime ยป Marxist, Feminist and Postmodernist Theories of Crime

What you'll learn this session

Study time: 30 minutes

Cambridge spec: 6.2.6

  • How Marxists explain crime: laws that serve the ruling class, selective enforcement and crimes of the powerful
  • How feminists explain crime: patriarchal control of women, female victimisation and gendered justice
  • How postmodernists explain crime: a fragmented society, new crimes and consumer lifestyles
  • The strengths and limitations of each theory

๐Ÿ”’ Unlock Full Course Content

Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!

Unlock This Course

Marxism: the law serves the powerful

Remember, Marxists see society as a conflict between the ruling class (the bourgeoisie) and the working class (the proletariat). Marxists use this idea to explain crime. They say the question is not only why people break the law, but who makes the law and who it protects.

Key terms:

  • Ruling class: the small group who own the wealth and industries and have most power in a capitalist society.
  • Selective enforcement: when laws are applied more strictly to some groups than to others.
  • Crimes of the powerful: harmful acts by rich and powerful people or organisations, such as polluting the environment or ignoring safety rules to save money.

Marxists make three main points:

  • Laws reflect ruling-class interests. Many laws protect private property and the system that keeps the ruling class in power. Laws are not a neutral set of rules that everyone agrees on.
  • Selective enforcement. Working-class crimes such as theft are policed closely and punished harshly. Crimes of the powerful are less likely to be investigated, and penalties are often lighter.
  • Crimes of the powerful. Marxists argue that these crimes can cause more harm than street crime, yet they are often hidden or not treated as "real" crime.

Example: a worker steals food from a shop and is arrested and sent to prison. A company pours waste into a river and is given a small fine that is far less than the money it saved. Marxists say the difference shows that the law favours the powerful.

Marxists also say that capitalism itself encourages crime, because it creates inequality and pushes people to want more wealth.

✅ Strengths

It shows that crime is not only a working-class problem. It explains why powerful people are rarely punished. It links crime to power and inequality, and shows that the law is not neutral.

❌ Limitations

Many laws, such as health and safety laws, protect ordinary people as well as the rich. It says little about crimes linked to gender or ethnicity. It does not explain why most working-class people do not commit crime.

Feminism: crime, control and victims

Feminists argue that most theories of crime are about men and ignore women. They link crime to patriarchy, which means male power over women. Feminists make three main points.

Key terms:

  • Female victimisation: women being the victims of crime, especially violence, sexual crimes and abuse from men.
  • Gendered justice: the idea that the criminal justice system treats men and women differently because of ideas about how each gender should behave.
  • Patriarchal control of women. Heidensohn argued that women commit less crime partly because they are controlled more closely than men: at home, in public and at work. Fear of harassment and violence also limits where women feel safe to go.
  • Female victimisation. Feminists say crimes against women, such as domestic abuse and sexual violence, are common but often go unreported and unrecorded. They say society and the police have not always taken these crimes seriously.
  • Gendered justice. Feminists argue that courts judge women against ideas of how women should behave. A woman who offends may be seen as breaking both the law and ideas of "proper" female behaviour, and so may be judged more harshly. (Remember, the chivalry thesis argues the opposite: see Explaining Crime: Gender.)

✅ Strengths

It brings women's experiences into the study of crime. It draws attention to hidden crimes such as domestic abuse. It helps to explain why women's offending is lower than men's.

❌ Limitations

It pays less attention to men as victims of crime. It treats all women as one group and says less about differences of class or ethnicity. Women have more freedom today, so claims about strict control may be out of date.

Postmodernism: a fragmented society

Remember, postmodernists say society is changing fast and that people can choose their identities (see Postmodernism: Is Identity Chosen?). Applied to crime, postmodernists make three main points.

Key terms:

  • Fragmented society: a society broken into many different groups, each with its own values, so that shared norms are weaker.
  • Identity theft: using another person's personal details, such as their name or bank details, to commit fraud.
  • Consumer lifestyle: a way of life centred on buying and owning goods that show who you are.
  • A fragmented society. With many groups and many sets of values, there is no single set of shared norms, so it is harder to agree on what is "deviant".
  • New crimes. Technology and globalisation create new crimes such as cyber crime and identity theft. These cross borders and are hard to police.
  • Crime and consumer lifestyles. Adverts and social media push people to own certain brands and styles. Some people who cannot afford them may turn to theft or fraud to keep up.

✅ Strengths

It explains new crimes of the digital age. It recognises that societies are more diverse than before. It links crime to consumer culture.

❌ Limitations

It may exaggerate how much society has changed, as many crimes are still traditional, such as theft and violence. It says little about power and inequality. Its ideas are vague and hard to test.

Common mistakes

Writing that Marxists say "only the working class commit crime". They say the law is enforced unfairly and that the powerful also commit harmful acts. Another mistake is saying feminists think women do not commit crime. They explain why women's offending is lower and say women are often victims. Finally, do not say postmodernists think there are no laws. They say shared norms are weaker and that new crimes appear.

Exam-style question

(a) Define the term identity theft. [2 marks]

(d) Explain three reasons why Marxists argue that the law does not treat all social classes equally. [6 marks]

Model answer

(a) Identity theft is using another person's personal details, such as their name or bank details (1), to commit fraud or other crime (1).

(d) Any three developed reasons, for example: Laws reflect ruling-class interests (1): many laws protect private property and the wealth of the powerful, so the law is not neutral (1). Selective enforcement (1): working-class crimes such as theft are policed and punished harshly, while crimes of the powerful get lighter penalties (1). Crimes of the powerful are hidden (1): harmful acts by companies, such as pollution, are often not treated as real crime even though they may harm many people (1).

Exam tip

For "explain three reasons", give a different Marxist idea in each point, and add a short example or a reason after each one to earn the second mark.

Test Your Knowledge
Chat to Sociology tutor