✅ Strengths
It shows that crime is not only a working-class problem. It explains why powerful people are rarely punished. It links crime to power and inequality, and shows that the law is not neutral.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseRemember, Marxists see society as a conflict between the ruling class (the bourgeoisie) and the working class (the proletariat). Marxists use this idea to explain crime. They say the question is not only why people break the law, but who makes the law and who it protects.
Key terms:
Marxists make three main points:
Example: a worker steals food from a shop and is arrested and sent to prison. A company pours waste into a river and is given a small fine that is far less than the money it saved. Marxists say the difference shows that the law favours the powerful.
Marxists also say that capitalism itself encourages crime, because it creates inequality and pushes people to want more wealth.
It shows that crime is not only a working-class problem. It explains why powerful people are rarely punished. It links crime to power and inequality, and shows that the law is not neutral.
Many laws, such as health and safety laws, protect ordinary people as well as the rich. It says little about crimes linked to gender or ethnicity. It does not explain why most working-class people do not commit crime.
Feminists argue that most theories of crime are about men and ignore women. They link crime to patriarchy, which means male power over women. Feminists make three main points.
Key terms:
It brings women's experiences into the study of crime. It draws attention to hidden crimes such as domestic abuse. It helps to explain why women's offending is lower than men's.
It pays less attention to men as victims of crime. It treats all women as one group and says less about differences of class or ethnicity. Women have more freedom today, so claims about strict control may be out of date.
Remember, postmodernists say society is changing fast and that people can choose their identities (see Postmodernism: Is Identity Chosen?). Applied to crime, postmodernists make three main points.
Key terms:
It explains new crimes of the digital age. It recognises that societies are more diverse than before. It links crime to consumer culture.
It may exaggerate how much society has changed, as many crimes are still traditional, such as theft and violence. It says little about power and inequality. Its ideas are vague and hard to test.
Writing that Marxists say "only the working class commit crime". They say the law is enforced unfairly and that the powerful also commit harmful acts. Another mistake is saying feminists think women do not commit crime. They explain why women's offending is lower and say women are often victims. Finally, do not say postmodernists think there are no laws. They say shared norms are weaker and that new crimes appear.
(a) Define the term identity theft. [2 marks]
(d) Explain three reasons why Marxists argue that the law does not treat all social classes equally. [6 marks]
(a) Identity theft is using another person's personal details, such as their name or bank details (1), to commit fraud or other crime (1).
(d) Any three developed reasons, for example: Laws reflect ruling-class interests (1): many laws protect private property and the wealth of the powerful, so the law is not neutral (1). Selective enforcement (1): working-class crimes such as theft are policed and punished harshly, while crimes of the powerful get lighter penalties (1). Crimes of the powerful are hidden (1): harmful acts by companies, such as pollution, are often not treated as real crime even though they may harm many people (1).
For "explain three reasons", give a different Marxist idea in each point, and add a short example or a reason after each one to earn the second mark.