📝 Paper 1
Research Methods, Identity and Inequality. 2 hours, 80 marks, 50%. You answer two questions of 40 marks each.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseEveryone who takes Cambridge IGCSE Sociology sits two written papers. Both are marked out of 80, and each is worth 50% of your grade. Grades run from A* to G. There are no tiers, so every candidate takes the same papers.
Research Methods, Identity and Inequality. 2 hours, 80 marks, 50%. You answer two questions of 40 marks each.
Family, Education and Crime. 1 hour 45 minutes, 80 marks, 50%. You answer two questions of 40 marks each.
Key terms:
The course has six topics. Three are examined in Paper 1 and three in Paper 2.
Research methods matters in every topic. The syllabus says that understanding research methods and their strengths and limitations underpins all the others. Expect a methods point to help you in almost any answer.
Question 1 on research methods is compulsory. Then you choose either Question 2 (Identity: self and society) or Question 3 (Social stratification and inequality).
Question 1 is Family, Question 2 is Education and Question 3 is Crime, deviance and social control. You answer two of the three.
Choose the topics you know best before you start writing.
Every question is worth 40 marks, and the parts are always in the same order, so you can learn the pattern now.
This applies to Questions 2 and 3 on Paper 1 and to every question on Paper 2. For help with the source parts of Question 1, see Reading Sources, Tables, Charts and Graphs. For part (e), see Planning Your Own Research Investigation.
Examiners mark with three assessment objectives (AOs). Each one is a different skill.
Knowledge and understanding. Show you know the concepts, theories, evidence, views and research methods.
Interpretation and application. Use that knowledge to support a point, build an argument, or explain how it applies to the issue in the question.
Analysis and evaluation. Explain strengths and limitations, develop arguments, and reach a conclusion based on the evidence.
The approximate weightings show where the marks are:
So knowing things is not enough. Over three-fifths of the marks need you to apply, analyse or evaluate.
The parts of a question climb like a ladder. Early parts mostly reward knowing a term or an example. Middle parts reward explaining and using evidence. The last parts reward the higher skills: building arguments, weighing them up and reaching a judgement.
In the longest parts, a list of facts is not enough. You are rewarded for arguments you develop and for a judgement you can support.
Marks are the best guide to time. Paper 1 gives you 120 minutes for 80 marks, which is about one and a half minutes per mark. Paper 2 gives you 105 minutes for 80 marks, which is a little over one minute per mark. Here is a plan you can adapt. It is advice, not an official rule.
Do not run over on a 2-mark part. Spend the saved time on the 14-mark and 12-mark parts, where the biggest marks are.
A candidate is revising for Paper 1 and Paper 2.
(a) Identify two differences between Paper 1 and Paper 2 in the way candidates choose their questions. [2 marks]
(b) Explain two reasons why a candidate should plan their time using the marks for each part. [4 marks]
(a) In Paper 1, Question 1 is compulsory (1), then the candidate chooses either Question 2 or Question 3, whereas in Paper 2 the candidate chooses two of the three questions (1).
(b) One reason is that the number of marks shows how much is expected, so a 2-mark part needs a short answer and a 14-mark part needs developed arguments (1), which stops the candidate over-writing small parts (1). A second reason is that each paper has a fixed time, so spending too long early leaves too little time for the high-mark parts such as (e) and (f) (1), where the most marks can be lost (1).
In a 2-mark part, count how many separate points it asks for, then give exactly that many, clearly separated.