🎯 Identify and state
Identify: name, select or recognise. State: express in clear terms. Give the answer and stop.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseA sociology question has two parts: the topic (what it is about) and the command word (what you must do with it). Many students know the topic well but lose marks because they do the wrong job. They describe when the question said explain, or they explain when it said evaluate.
Cambridge says command words "help candidates know what is expected from them in the exams". Their meaning always relates to the subject context, so in sociology each one has a clear job.
Key terms:
The meanings below are Cambridge's own. Learn them in four groups.
Recall words: short answers
Identify: name, select or recognise. State: express in clear terms. Give the answer and stop.
Give: produce an answer from a given source or from memory. Define: give precise meaning. A definition is exact, not a story.
Set-out words: say what something is like
State the points of a topic and give its characteristics and main features.
Set out the main points. Keep it brief and clear.
Select and present the main points, without detail.
Reasoning words: say why
Set out purposes or reasons, make the relationships between things clear, say why and/or how and support with relevant evidence.
Take forward to a more advanced stage or build upon given information. Add an extra step to a point you have already made.
Support a case with evidence or argument. Choose a side and prove it.
Apply knowledge and understanding to situations where there are a range of valid responses, in order to make proposals or put forward considerations.
Judging words: weigh it up
Write about issues or topics in depth in a structured way.
Make an informed judgement.
Judge or calculate the quality, importance, amount or value of something.
Describing when asked to explain is a common slip. A description says what happens. An explanation says why or how it happens. Another is writing a long essay for "Identify two" or "Give two". Those are worth 2 marks, so name them and move on.
The syllabus asks for at least three developed points with evidence. Use this simple pattern for each point:
A short closing sentence that pulls the points together can help. Discuss means in depth and in a structured way, so each point gets its own paragraph.
This is the biggest question. You need at least three arguments for, three arguments against, and a conclusion. "Evaluate the view that..." gives you a statement and asks you to judge it.
Three developed arguments that support the view, each with evidence.
Three developed arguments that challenge it, each with evidence.
The conclusion is not a repeat. It answers the question: how far do you agree, and why? Give a reason that comes from your arguments.
For: (1) young people spend many hours on screens, so media messages reach them every day; (2) social media shows ideas about looks and lifestyle to copy; (3) global media spreads the same styles across countries.
Against: (1) the family gives primary socialisation, so it comes first; (2) peer groups apply strong pressure through approval and rejection; (3) school teaches values and rules through the hidden curriculum.
Conclusion: the media is powerful, but it works alongside family, peers and school. Judge which matters most and say why.
Notice that every argument is one line here. In the exam, each becomes a full developed point.
In evaluate answers, students often write only "for" points, or end with "so those are the arguments". Each side needs three developed points and the conclusion must make a judgement.
(a) Define the term sanction. [2 marks]
(b) Discuss how the peer group influences the behaviour of young people. [8 marks]
(a) A sanction is a reward or a punishment (1) used to encourage conformity or to discourage unwanted behaviour (1).
(b) Point 1: peers set norms about the slang and humour a group uses (1). A young person who talks the same way is accepted, so they copy it to belong (1). Point 2: peers use sanctions (1). Praise and inclusion reward conformity, while teasing and being left out punish those who do not follow the group (1). Point 3: peers can encourage risk or rule-breaking (1). A group that sees truanting as cool may pressure members to skip lessons (1). Linking sentence: the peer group is powerful because young people want approval, but family and school also shape behaviour, so peers are one influence among several (2).
Before writing, underline the command word, then circle the topic. For an 8-mark discuss question, write "1, 2, 3" in the margin and plan one developed point for each number.