๐ง Test Your Knowledge!
What are the roles and functions of education? ยป Functionalist view - meritocracy and social mobility
What you'll learn this session
Study time: 30 minutes
- The functionalist perspective on education
- How education contributes to social integration and solidarity
- The concept of meritocracy in education
- How education promotes social mobility
- Key sociologists associated with functionalist views on education
- Criticisms of the functionalist perspective
Introduction to Functionalist Views on Education
Functionalism is one of the major theoretical perspectives in sociology that views society as a complex system of interconnected parts working together to maintain stability. When functionalists look at education, they focus on how schools and the education system contribute positively to the smooth running of society.
Key Definitions:
- Functionalism: A theoretical perspective that sees society as a system of interconnected parts that work together to maintain social stability.
- Meritocracy: A system where people achieve status and rewards based on their ability and effort rather than their social background.
- Social mobility: The movement of individuals or groups from one social position to another in society's hierarchy.
★ Key Functionalist Thinkers
Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) - Saw education as crucial for creating social solidarity and transmitting society's norms and values.
Talcott Parsons (1902-1979) - Viewed schools as a bridge between family and wider society, preparing children for adult roles.
Davis and Moore - Argued education helps sort people into appropriate jobs based on their abilities (role allocation).
✓ Main Functions of Education
1. Social solidarity - Creating shared values and social cohesion
2. Skills provision - Teaching knowledge and skills needed for work
3. Role allocation - Matching talents to appropriate jobs
4. Meritocracy - Promoting achievement based on ability and effort
Education and Social Integration
For functionalists, one of education's most important roles is creating social solidarity โ the sense that we all belong to the same society with shared values and goals.
Durkheim on Social Solidarity
Emile Durkheim believed education was vital for creating social cohesion. He argued that schools teach children:
- Shared values and beliefs - Through subjects like history and citizenship
- Social rules - Learning to follow timetables, respect authority and work with others
- Collective identity - School uniforms, assemblies and celebrations create a sense of belonging
For example, when students sing the national anthem, celebrate national holidays, or learn about their country's history, they develop a sense of national identity and social belonging.
Real-World Example: School Rituals
Think about the rituals in UK schools that create a sense of belonging: morning assemblies, sports days, school uniforms, house systems and school mottos. These all help students feel part of something bigger than themselves and learn shared values.
For instance, many schools have house systems where students compete in various activities, fostering both team spirit and a sense of belonging to the wider school community.
Education, Meritocracy and Social Mobility
A central claim of functionalists is that education creates a meritocratic society where people succeed based on their abilities and efforts, not their social background.
The Meritocratic Ideal
According to functionalists, education helps create a fair society by:
⊕ Equal Opportunities
Schools provide all students with the same chance to succeed, regardless of their background.
⊕ Reward Based on Merit
Students who work hard and have ability are rewarded with qualifications and access to better jobs.
⊕ Social Mobility
Education allows talented individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds to move up the social ladder.
Talcott Parsons argued that schools act as a 'bridge' between family and society. In families, children are treated differently based on who they are (e.g., age, personality). But in schools, all students are judged by the same standards โ their academic performance. This prepares them for the adult world where people are judged on achievement rather than background.
Case Study Focus: Rags to Riches
The UK has many examples of people who used education to achieve social mobility:
Alan Sugar - Born to a working-class family in East London, left school at 16, but used his business skills to become a billionaire and was eventually made a Lord.
Stormzy - Grew up on a council estate in South London, but excelled academically and was offered a place at Oxford University before pursuing his music career. He now funds scholarships for Black students to attend Cambridge University.
These examples are often used to support the idea that the UK is a meritocracy where talent and hard work are rewarded.
Role Allocation and Skills Provision
Functionalists argue that education helps society run smoothly by ensuring people end up in jobs that match their abilities.
Davis and Moore: Sorting and Sifting
Sociologists Davis and Moore argued that education acts as a sorting mechanism that identifies the most talented individuals and channels them into the most important and demanding jobs. This process benefits society because:
- The most capable people fill the most important roles
- People are motivated to work hard to achieve higher positions
- The system feels fair because positions are earned through merit
For example, students who excel in science subjects might be encouraged to become doctors or engineers, while those with strong communication skills might be directed toward careers in law or teaching.
♦ Skills for Work
Functionalists highlight how education provides both:
Specific skills - Subject knowledge, literacy, numeracy, IT skills
General skills - Punctuality, following instructions, working with others
These prepare young people for their future roles in the workforce and help the economy function efficiently.
♦ Secondary Socialisation
Schools continue the socialisation process started by families:
Universal values - Teaching wider societal norms beyond family values
Preparing for adult life - Learning to interact with authority figures and peers
Future roles - Developing skills and attitudes needed for adult responsibilities
Criticisms of the Functionalist View
While functionalism offers important insights into education's role in society, many sociologists criticise this perspective for being too positive and ignoring problems in the education system.
Is Education Really Meritocratic?
Critics argue that the idea of education as a meritocracy doesn't match reality:
- Social class differences - Middle-class children generally perform better in education than working-class children
- Private education - Wealthy families can pay for advantages through private schooling
- Cultural capital - Middle-class families often have knowledge, attitudes and resources that help their children succeed in education
For example, research shows that even when working-class students achieve the same grades as middle-class students, they are less likely to attend top universities or enter prestigious professions.
Alternative Perspectives
Other sociological perspectives offer different views on education:
Marxists argue that education reproduces inequality by preparing working-class children for working-class jobs while helping middle-class children maintain their advantages.
Feminists point out that despite girls' academic success, gender inequality persists in subject choices and career paths.
Interactionists focus on how teacher expectations and labelling can create self-fulfilling prophecies that affect student achievement.
Summary: The Functionalist View of Education
To summarise, functionalists see education as performing several vital roles that help society function smoothly:
- Creating social solidarity through shared values and experiences
- Providing skills and knowledge needed for future work roles
- Allocating people to appropriate jobs based on their abilities
- Enabling social mobility through a meritocratic system
While this perspective highlights important positive functions of education, critics argue it presents an overly optimistic view that doesn't adequately address how education can reproduce inequality. A balanced understanding of education's role in society requires considering multiple sociological perspectives.
Log in to track your progress and mark lessons as complete!
Login Now
Don't have an account? Sign up here.