☆ Formal vs Informal Control
Formal control involves official sanctions, written rules and legal punishments administered by government agencies.
Database results: examBoard: Cambridge examType: IGCSE lessonTitle: Methods of control used by formal agencies - arrest, sentencing, imprisonment
While we often think we make our own choices in life, powerful forces in society work to control our behaviour. Formal social control refers to the official ways that society regulates people's actions through laws, rules and punishments. These controls are carried out by formal agencies like the police, courts and prisons.
Key Definitions:
Formal control involves official sanctions, written rules and legal punishments administered by government agencies.
Understanding formal control helps us recognise how power operates in society and how certain groups may be affected differently by these systems.
Arrest is often the first direct contact a person has with the formal control system. It represents the power of the state to physically restrict someone's freedom based on suspected law-breaking.
When police arrest someone, they're exercising one of the most visible forms of state power. Arrest serves several social control functions:
Physically removes alleged offenders from society, stopping ongoing crimes and preventing immediate harm.
The threat of arrest discourages others from committing similar offences (general deterrence).
Demonstrates the consequences of breaking social rules, reinforcing the authority of the state.
In the UK, police have powers to stop and search individuals they suspect of carrying illegal items. Statistics consistently show that Black people are 9 times more likely to be stopped and searched than White people. This raises important questions about how arrest powers may reinforce existing social inequalities. The Lammy Review (2017) highlighted significant racial disparities throughout the criminal justice system.
After arrest and conviction, sentencing is how society officially determines punishment. Sentences serve multiple purposes in the social control system.
The UK courts can impose various sentences depending on the offence and circumstances:
Each type of sentence aims to control behaviour in different ways:
Punishment: Making offenders 'pay' for their crimes.
Deterrence: Discouraging future offending.
Rehabilitation: Changing offenders' behaviour.
Public protection: Keeping dangerous individuals away from society.
Reparation: Making amends to victims or society.
The UK has a separate youth justice system for offenders aged 10-17. This recognises that young people may be more responsive to rehabilitation than punishment. Youth Rehabilitation Orders can include education requirements, curfews and supervision. This demonstrates how sentencing can be adapted to different social groups with the aim of more effective control.
Imprisonment represents the most extreme form of formal social control in modern democratic societies. It physically removes individuals from society and places them in highly controlled environments.
Prisons exercise control in multiple ways:
Physically prevents offenders from committing further crimes in society during their sentence.
Loss of freedom serves as both punishment and a warning to others about consequences of crime.
Programmes aim to address offending behaviour and prepare prisoners for reintegration into society.
The UK has one of the highest imprisonment rates in Western Europe, with approximately 82,000 people in prison. Over 95% of prisoners are male and ethnic minorities are significantly overrepresented. This raises sociological questions about which groups are most subject to this extreme form of social control and why.
Sociologists often take a critical view of formal social control, examining who benefits from these systems and who may be disadvantaged.
While formal control methods are presented as necessary for social order, they face several criticisms:
Discrimination: Certain groups (ethnic minorities, working-class people) experience disproportionate control.
Labelling: Contact with the criminal justice system can create stigma that leads to further deviance.
Reoffending: High recidivism rates suggest imprisonment often fails to change behaviour long-term.
Cost: Formal control is expensive - it costs approximately £44,000 per year to keep someone in prison in the UK.
Marxist sociologists argue that formal control primarily protects the interests of the powerful, while controlling the working class. Meanwhile, feminist perspectives highlight how the criminal justice system often fails to adequately address crimes against women while simultaneously treating female offenders differently.
Formal social control through arrest, sentencing and imprisonment represents society's most direct methods of regulating behaviour. While these mechanisms are necessary for maintaining order, sociologists encourage us to question how they operate, who they target and whether they achieve their stated aims.
As you continue your sociology studies, consider how formal control interacts with informal control methods (like family socialisation and peer pressure) to shape behaviour. Also reflect on how different theoretical perspectives (functionalist, Marxist, feminist) would interpret these control mechanisms differently.
If you were designing a criminal justice system from scratch, what balance would you strike between punishment, rehabilitation and other goals? How might your system address the criticisms of current formal control methods?
Log in to track your progress and mark lessons as complete!
Login NowDon't have an account? Sign up here.