Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseImagine your favourite park on a sunny bank holiday packed with people, litter everywhere, queues for the toilets and the grass completely worn away. Now multiply that by thousands of tourists every single day. That is the reality for many of the world's most popular destinations.
Managing visitor numbers and behaviour is one of the most important jobs in sustainable tourism. Without it, the very things that make a place special its wildlife, culture, landscapes and atmosphere can be destroyed by the people who come to enjoy them.
Key Definitions:
Barcelona receives over 32 million tourists per year that is more than 20 times its resident population. In 2024, local residents took to the streets with water pistols to protest against overtourism. Managing visitor numbers is no longer optional it is urgent.
There are two broad approaches to controlling how many people visit a destination: hard management (physical controls and regulations) and soft management (education, incentives and persuasion). Most destinations use a mix of both.
These are firm, enforceable limits on visitor numbers. They include entry caps, ticketing systems, timed entry slots and outright bans during sensitive periods. They are effective but can feel restrictive and may reduce tourism income.
These encourage tourists to change their behaviour without forcing them. They rely on information, pricing and marketing to spread visitors more evenly across time and space.
Amsterdam is one of Europe's most visited cities, attracting around 20 million tourists per year to a city of just 900,000 residents. The city centre was becoming overwhelmed, with residents unable to afford housing and streets clogged with stag parties and day-trippers.
In 2023, Amsterdam launched one of the boldest demarketing campaigns in tourism history. Rather than attracting more visitors, the city actively discouraged certain tourists from coming.
The city ran online adverts targeting young British men searching for "stag do Amsterdam" telling them directly: "Stay away." The campaign was called "Stay Away" and was deliberately blunt.
Amsterdam also banned new hotels in the city centre, closed cruise ship terminals, raised tourist taxes to the highest in Europe and banned smoking cannabis in public in the red-light district.
Rather than maximising visitor numbers, Amsterdam wants to attract quality tourists who respect the city, spend more money and cause less disruption. This is the "high value, low volume" approach applied to a city.
In the exam, you may be asked to evaluate visitor number management strategies. Remember to consider both advantages (protecting the environment, improving resident quality of life) and disadvantages (reduced income, access inequality, difficult to enforce).
One of the most powerful tools for managing visitor numbers is price. By making it more expensive to visit or by requiring advance permits destination managers can reduce the total number of visitors and ensure those who do come are committed and respectful.
Palau is a tiny island nation in the Pacific Ocean, famous for its extraordinary coral reefs and marine biodiversity. With a population of just 18,000, it was struggling to cope with growing tourist numbers threatening its fragile ecosystems.
In 2017, Palau introduced the Palau Pledge a legally binding promise that every visitor must sign in their passport on arrival. The pledge commits tourists to act in an environmentally responsible way, respect local culture and protect nature.
In 2018, Palau went further by banning reef-toxic sunscreen any sunscreen containing chemicals harmful to coral reefs. Tourists caught with banned sunscreen face fines of up to $1,000.
Palau also introduced a $100 "pristine paradise" environmental fee added to all departure taxes. The money funds conservation projects across the islands.
The pledge creates a psychological commitment tourists who sign it are more likely to behave responsibly. It also raises awareness of environmental issues before tourists even leave the airport. Palau has seen measurable improvements in reef health since the scheme began.
Critics argue the pledge is difficult to enforce once tourists leave the airport. It also relies on tourists being honest and self-regulating. However, combined with the sunscreen ban and environmental fee, it forms a comprehensive behaviour management package.
Even when visitor numbers are controlled, the behaviour of tourists can still cause serious damage. Graffiti on ancient monuments, feeding wildlife, straying off paths, dropping litter and being noisy in sacred spaces are all examples of harmful tourist behaviour that must be managed.
Key Definitions:
Visitor centres, guided tours, information boards and leaflets help tourists understand why certain behaviours matter. When people understand the impact of their actions, they are more likely to change them.
Boardwalks, fences, roped-off areas and designated paths physically guide tourists away from sensitive areas. They do not need to rely on tourists reading signs they simply make the right path the only path.
Some destinations enforce strict rules with heavy penalties. Singapore fines tourists for chewing gum. Thailand has banned touching or climbing on Buddha statues. Fines act as a deterrent and signal that behaviour matters.
Yellowstone is one of the world's most famous national parks, covering nearly 9,000 km² across Wyoming, Montana and Idaho. It attracts around 4 million visitors per year and is home to bison, wolves, grizzly bears and geysers.
Tourist behaviour has been a serious problem at Yellowstone. Visitors have been filmed approaching bison for selfies, throwing objects into geothermal pools (which damages the delicate microbial ecosystems) and feeding bears which causes bears to associate humans with food and ultimately leads to the animals being destroyed.
Yellowstone uses a wide range of behaviour management strategies:
In 2016, two tourists picked up a bison calf they thought was cold and put it in their car. The calf was rejected by its herd and had to be euthanised. This incident led to a major public awareness campaign reminding visitors that wildlife is wild and that well-meaning interference can be deadly.
Modern technology is transforming how destinations manage visitor numbers and behaviour. Real-time data, apps and smart systems allow managers to respond to problems as they happen rather than waiting until damage is already done.
Many heritage sites now use timed entry ticketing visitors book a specific time slot in advance, spreading arrivals throughout the day and preventing bottlenecks. Apps can show real-time crowd levels, helping visitors choose quieter times to visit. The Acropolis in Athens introduced timed entry in 2023 after visitor numbers caused physical damage to the ancient stone pathways.
Footfall sensors count how many people pass through an area. Thermal cameras detect crowd build-up. Drone surveillance monitors behaviour in remote areas of national parks. Kyoto, Japan installed cameras and barriers in the Gion geisha district after tourists were repeatedly found trespassing into private alleyways to photograph geishas.
The Cinque Terre is a string of five colourful fishing villages clinging to dramatic cliffsides on the Italian Riviera. It is a UNESCO World Heritage Site and one of Italy's most photographed destinations. In peak season, the narrow coastal paths and tiny village streets become dangerously overcrowded.
The Cinque Terre National Park has introduced a layered visitor management system:
The result has been a more manageable flow of visitors, reduced erosion on the clifftop paths and a better experience for both tourists and the 4,000 residents who actually live there.
One of the biggest challenges in visitor management is fairness. If you charge high entry fees or require advance booking, you may protect the environment but you also risk making tourism exclusive. Only wealthy tourists will be able to afford to visit, which raises serious questions about equality and access.
Fewer, wealthier tourists who spend more money can generate the same or greater income as large numbers of budget tourists with less environmental damage. This is the "high value, low volume" model used by Bhutan and Palau.
Natural and cultural heritage belongs to everyone. Pricing people out of visiting their own country's national parks or heritage sites is unfair. Many countries offer free or subsidised entry for residents to address this concern.
Ultimately, if a site is destroyed by overtourism, nobody can visit it. Short-term restrictions and costs are justified if they protect a destination for future generations the core principle of sustainable development.