💭 Mind is real
Four of the five khandhas are mental, not physical. Buddhists do not teach that a person is nothing more than a physical body.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseIn Do Humans Have a Soul? Human Nature and Physicalism, you saw that Buddhists believe there is no fixed, unchanging soul. This lesson explains that belief. The Buddha taught that three things are true of every human life. Buddhists call them the three marks of existence. The Dhammapada sums them up in verses 277-279: everything that arises is impermanent, everything that arises is unsatisfactory, and all things are without a self.
Key terms:
Remember, anicca means impermanence. In human life it means that your body ages, your moods come and go, and your opinions shift. No part of you stays the same.
Dukkha covers obvious pain, such as illness and grief. It also covers a quieter feeling: even happy times end, so nothing satisfies us for good.
If every part of a person changes, Buddhists say, then no part can be a permanent 'me'. There is no unchanging soul hidden inside.
Buddhists believe the three marks are linked. Because everything is impermanent (anicca), they say, holding on to things as if they will last leads to suffering (dukkha). And because everything about a person is impermanent, they believe there is no fixed self (anatta). You will study dukkha in more depth in The Four Noble Truths: Dukkha and Tanha.
If there is no soul, what is a human being? The Buddha's answer was the five khandhas (often called the five aggregates). A person is five 'heaps' of changing parts working together. Learn both sets of English names.
Your tongue touches the fruit (body). The taste is pleasant (feelings). You know it is a mango and that it is sweet (recognition). You want another bite and choose to take one (motivation). All the time you are aware of the taste (conscious awareness). Buddhists say there is no extra 'self' behind the five khandhas doing the eating.
Only the first khandha is physical. The other four are mental. All five are changing all the time.
A well-known Buddhist text, the Questions of King Milinda, explains this with a chariot. The monk Nagasena asked the king whether the chariot was its wheels, its axle or its pole. The king agreed that it was none of these on its own. 'Chariot' is just a useful name for the parts when they are put together. In the same way, Nagasena said, his own name was only a label for the five khandhas.
Many people in the Buddha's time believed that each person has an eternal soul. The Buddha did not accept this, and Buddhists give these reasons:
Anatta does not mean that you do not exist. Buddhists still say 'I' and 'me' as useful labels, like 'chariot'. What they reject is a fixed, unchanging self behind the label.
Remember, physicalism says that the real world is nothing more than the physical world. Like physicalists, Buddhists say there is no immortal soul. But Buddhism is not physicalism:
Four of the five khandhas are mental, not physical. Buddhists do not teach that a person is nothing more than a physical body.
Buddhists believe a person's actions (kamma) have results that carry on into another life. So the Buddha rejected two views: that a soul lasts for ever, and that a person simply ends at death.
How there can be rebirth when there is no soul is taught in Samsara, Kamma and Rebirth in Buddhism.
Buddhists do not all stress the same points. Theravada Buddhists focus on the three marks and the five khandhas as set out here. Mahayana Buddhists accept these too, and go further. They teach sunyata (emptiness): nothing at all has a fixed nature of its own. Many Mahayana Buddhists also teach that every being has Buddha-nature, the potential to become enlightened.
Do not write that Buddhists believe in an immortal soul that is reborn. Do not write that anatta means people are not real, or that Buddhists are physicalists. And do not say that dukkha only means pain: it also means that nothing fully satisfies.
Paper 1 style question. Parts (a) and (b) test AO1. Parts (c) and (d) test AO1 and AO2.
(a) Identify three things that some religious people believe make up a human being. [3 marks]
(b) Choose one religion. Outline two beliefs about the nature of human beings in this religion. [4 marks]
(c) Explain why some religious people do not believe that human beings have an immortal soul. [6 marks]
(d) 'No part of a human being lasts for ever.' Evaluate this statement, showing you have considered different points of view. In your answer you should refer to at least one religion. [12 marks]
(a) 1. A body (1). 2. Feelings (1). 3. Conscious awareness (1).
(b) Buddhists believe in anatta (1), which means that a person has no fixed, permanent self or soul (1). Buddhists also believe a person is made up of the five khandhas (1), for example the body, feelings and conscious awareness, which are all changing all the time (1).
(c) Buddhists do not believe in an immortal soul because of anicca, the teaching that everything is impermanent. A soul that lasted for ever would not fit this teaching.
A second reason is the teaching of the five khandhas. The Buddha taught that a person is made up of body, feelings, recognition, motivation and conscious awareness. Each of these changes all the time, so none of them can be a permanent self. The monk Nagasena explained that a person's name, like the word 'chariot', is only a label for parts working together.
A third reason is that belief in a fixed self leads to dukkha. Thinking about 'me' and 'mine' causes clinging and selfishness. This means that accepting anatta helps Buddhists to be less selfish and more compassionate.
(d) Plan. For: Buddhists teach anicca and anatta: all five khandhas change, so nothing in a person is permanent (the chariot); physicalists and humanists agree there is no soul, because the mind depends on the brain and no soul has ever been detected.
Against: many religious people are dualists and believe in an immortal soul; the feeling of being the same person through life seems to point to something lasting; even in Buddhism death is not a full stop, because the results of kamma carry on, and many Mahayana Buddhists speak of a Buddha-nature in every being.
Possible conclusion: judge each point as you go, then pick a side. For example: I agree, because everything we can observe about a person changes. But 'no part lasts for ever' is not the same as 'nothing carries on', as the Buddhist teaching on kamma shows.
In part (b), give the religious term and its meaning together, such as 'anatta, which means no fixed self'. The term earns the point and the meaning earns the development mark.