🍞 The message for the poor
An honest person who has little is respected. Having little is nothing to be ashamed of.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseIn Rich and Poor: Charity, Justice and Compassion you learned that many religious and non-religious people believe the wealthy have a responsibility to help the poor. Now we look at the Sikh answer. It begins with one of the three duties of a Sikh.
Sikhs are taught three duties: to remember God (nam simran), to earn an honest living (kirat karni) and to share what you have with others. This third duty is vand chakna. It is often put in a short phrase: earn honestly, then share.
The idea comes from Guru Nanak, the first Guru, who farmed land at Kartarpur and shared what he grew with those who came to him. A verse in the Guru Granth Sahib (page 1245) says that a person who works for what they eat and gives some of it away has found the right way to live.
Key terms:
Many Sikhs put vand chakna into practice through dasvandh. They set aside one tenth of what they earn for charity, the gurdwara (Sikh place of worship) or people in need. Because it is a fixed share, it turns a good intention into a habit. A wealthy person gives more than a poor person, but both give the same fraction.
Sikhs do not teach that being rich is wrong. Guru Nanak taught that Sikhs should live as householders, with a job and a family, and not leave the world behind. Wealth is fine if it is honestly earned and shared.
The danger is attachment. Remember maya from Maya, Manmukh and Haumai: being pulled away from God by things that do not last. A rich person who clings to money and ignores the poor is caught in maya. A person who shares is loosening its hold.
Sikhs tell a well-known story, passed down by tradition, to show what honest earning means. In the town of Eminabad, Guru Nanak stayed with Bhai Lalo, a poor carpenter who earned his living by honest work. Meanwhile Malik Bhago, a rich and powerful local man, held a great feast and invited the Guru. Guru Nanak stayed with Lalo and ate his simple food.
Malik Bhago was angry and asked why. In the tradition, Guru Nanak asked for food from both men. He held Lalo's simple bread in one hand and Bhago's rich food in the other and squeezed them. Milk is said to have come from Lalo's bread and blood from Bhago's food. Sikhs understand the story to mean that money taken unfairly from others brings harm, and that honest earnings, even small ones, are pure.
An honest person who has little is respected. Having little is nothing to be ashamed of.
Think about how your wealth was earned, and share it instead of keeping it all for yourself.
These show the ideals of charity, justice and compassion: giving freely, treating all people as equal in worth, and caring for those who suffer.
(a) Identify three Sikh duties. [3 marks]
(b) Choose one religion. Outline two ways the wealthy are encouraged to help the poor in this religion. [4 marks]
(c) Choose one religion. Explain why wealth should be shared in this religion. [6 marks]
(d) "Giving a tenth of your income is too much to ask." Evaluate this statement, showing you have considered different points of view. In your answer you should refer to at least one religion. [12 marks]
(a) 1. Remembering God (nam simran) (1) 2. Earning an honest living (kirat karni) (1) 3. Sharing with others (vand chakna) (1)
(b) Sikhism. The wealthy are taught vand chakna, which means sharing what they have (1), so a rich Sikh is expected to help those in need (1). Many give dasvandh, a tenth of their earnings (1), which makes giving a regular habit (1).
(c) Sikhs share wealth because vand chakna is one of the three duties of a Sikh (1), so sharing is part of living the faith, not an extra. Guru Nanak taught that a person who earns honestly and gives some away has found the right way to live (1). Sikhs also believe that holding tightly to money is maya, which pulls people away from God, so sharing loosens its hold (1). In the story of Bhai Lalo and Malik Bhago, honest earnings are pure while wealth taken unfairly causes harm, so Sikhs share what they earn fairly (1). Sharing also expresses the belief that all people have the same divine light, so the poor deserve equal care, as the free langar shows (1). Because of this, a Sikh with wealth is expected to use it for sewa and for others (1).
(d) Plan. For the statement: a tenth is a large share for a family on a low income; people have rent, food and debts to pay; some non-religious people say giving should be a free choice, not a fixed share. Against: dasvandh is a fraction, so a poor Sikh gives little and a rich Sikh gives more; Sikhs say it loosens attachment (maya) and turns care for others into a habit; time given in sewa also counts as sharing. Conclusion: a possible conclusion is that the amount is fair for most people because it is a fraction, and that Sikhs see giving as a duty, not a burden, though a family struggling to eat might reasonably give less.
In a "Choose one religion" question, name Sikhism and use its own terms (vand chakna, dasvandh, sewa) in every part. A general point about "being kind" gets few marks.