🐒 The 'monkey' view
A baby monkey must cling to its mother while she carries it. In the same way, a person must make an effort to hold on to God, and God then saves them.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseThe lesson Free Will, Determinism and Predestination set out the general debate. Hinduism's own answer is built on one idea: karma.
Karma is a Sanskrit word meaning 'action'. The law of karma says that every action a person chooses to do brings a result that comes back to them. Kind and honest actions bring good results. Harmful actions bring suffering. One of the Upanishads, the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, teaches that a person becomes what they do: good by good actions and bad by bad actions.
Many Hindus see karma as a natural law, not as a judge handing out prizes and punishments. It is more like farming. Whoever sows rice gets rice. The result may come in this life or in another, because Hindus believe the atman is born again many times. That teaching comes in Samsara, Karma and Reincarnation in Hinduism.
The spec uses the plural, 'karmas'. Hindu teachers usually describe three kinds.
Key terms:
The whole store from the past. It is far too much to work through in one lifetime, so most of it waits.
The share that has 'ripened' for this life. Hindus believe it sets the starting point: the body, family and circumstances a person is born into.
The fresh karma made today. It is added to the store and will shape the future.
A traditional picture is the archer. The arrows in the quiver on the archer's back are sanchita karma. The arrow already flying through the air is prarabdha karma: it cannot be called back. The arrow in the archer's hand is kriyamana karma. The archer still decides where to aim it, or whether to shoot at all.
Hindus do not claim that people are completely free. Three limits stand out.
Inside these limits, Hindus believe the present choice is free. Past karma gives the situation. It does not give the response.
Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, a Hindu philosopher who became President of India, compared life to a game of cards. The cards are dealt to us and we do not pick them: they come from our past karma. But we are free to play them as we choose, and as we play, we win or lose.
The Gita supports this in three ways:
An old Sanskrit saying puts destiny and effort together: a chariot cannot move on one wheel, and destiny achieves nothing without human effort.
Hindus who worship a personal God, such as Vishnu or Shiva, believe karma is not the whole story. Many believe God watches over the law of karma and makes sure results are fair. The Gita (chapter 18) says the Lord lives in the heart of every being and makes them all turn, as if they were fixed on a machine. Yet near the end of the Gita Krishna promises that those who give up everything else and take refuge in him will be set free from all their sins. This is grace: God's free gift, which karma alone could not earn.
How much does the person have to do? One group of Vishnu's worshippers in South India split over this question.
A baby monkey must cling to its mother while she carries it. In the same way, a person must make an effort to hold on to God, and God then saves them.
A kitten does nothing. Its mother picks it up by the neck. In the same way, God's grace does everything, and a person only has to stop resisting.
Many Advaita Hindus think differently again. They say karma belongs only to the body and mind. The atman itself was never bound, so knowing your true self is freedom.
Most Hindus say no, for three reasons.
Views differ, though. Some Hindus speak of events as 'written' in their destiny, and some consult astrologers about the future.
Responsibility. Because karma comes from a person's own free actions, Hindus believe each person is responsible for what they do. Nobody can blame God, the stars or other people for their own choices. The gunas and past karma explain why a choice is hard. They do not excuse it. Karma also does not replace human justice: in Hindu tradition, punishing wrongdoers fairly is part of a ruler's dharma.
Do not write that karma means fate. Only prarabdha karma is fixed, and it fixes a person's situation, not their choices. Do not write 'karma' as if it only meant punishment: the word means action, and good actions bring good results. And do not mix up the three kinds.
Paper 1 style. (a) and (b) test AO1; (c) and (d) test AO1 and AO2.
(a) Identify three beliefs about what decides a person's future. [3 marks]
(b) Choose one religion. Outline two teachings about human freedom in this religion. [4 marks]
(c) Choose one religion. Explain why followers of this religion believe that people are responsible for their actions. [6 marks]
(d) 'Belief in karma means that people are not really free.' Evaluate this statement, showing you have considered different points of view. In your answer you should refer to at least one religion. [12 marks]
(a) 1. God decides it (1). 2. A person's own actions decide it (1). 3. Their genes and upbringing decide it (1).
(b) Hinduism. Hindus teach that people are free to choose how they act now (1), for example Krishna tells Arjuna in the Gita to think it over and then do as he wishes (1). Hindus also teach that freedom is limited by prarabdha karma (1), which means a person does not choose the body, family or circumstances they are born into (1).
(c) Hinduism. Hindus believe in the law of karma: every action brings a result that returns to the person who did it. This means nobody else can be blamed for what happens to them, because it comes from their own choices.
Hindus also believe the present choice is free. Prarabdha karma and the gunas shape a person's situation and character, but they do not force a response.
Finally, the Gita teaches that a person must lift themselves up by their own effort. So today's actions, the kriyamana karma, are truly a person's own, and they will answer for them.
(d) Plan. For: prarabdha karma fixes a person's birth and many events, like an arrow already shot; the Gita says Arjuna's nature will drive him to fight; some Hindus consult astrologers; hard determinists say past causes fixing the present is not freedom.
Against: only one of the three karmas is fixed, and kriyamana karma is made by free choices now; Krishna leaves the decision to Arjuna; karma only makes sense if people choose freely, since it holds them responsible; many Hindus believe grace and knowledge can remove past karma.
Possible conclusion: judge each point as you go, then pick a side. For example: I disagree. Karma limits where a person starts, but the whole teaching depends on people freely choosing their next action, so karma needs freedom.
In part (d), use the three karmas by name. Showing that prarabdha karma is fixed while kriyamana karma is free lets you argue both sides of the statement from inside Hinduism, which is what the top level rewards.