🧠 Haumai leads to harm
Recall that haumai is putting the self first. A person ruled by it can ignore others, hurt them and cause injustice because their own wants come first.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseIn The Problem of Evil and Suffering you met natural evil, moral evil and the question of how a good, all-powerful God allows suffering. This lesson shows how Sikhism answers that question. Sikhs call suffering dukh, and they believe it is part of life for everyone.
Key terms:
Remember too that hukam is God's will or order, karma means actions and their results, and sewa is selfless service.
Some people think evil comes from a devil. Sikhism does not teach this: Sikhs believe in one God and no devil who works against God. They believe moral evil comes from people and, in particular, from the problems you studied in Maya, Manmukh and Haumai.
Recall that haumai is putting the self first. A person ruled by it can ignore others, hurt them and cause injustice because their own wants come first.
Recall the five thieves (lust, anger, greed, attachment and pride). Anger can lead to violence, greed to theft and cruelty, and pride to war.
So for Sikhs, moral evil is not inevitable and not the work of a devil. It comes from human choices made under the pull of the self.
Sikhs give more than one reason, and they often say these work together.
Many Sikhs say that hard times can make a person turn away from pride and towards God, because they stop relying on themselves. Suffering is then seen as a chance to grow, not only as a punishment.
You have seen that the aim of Sikh life is to overcome haumai, live as a gurmukh (God-centred) and finally be united with God, which Sikhs call mukti (liberation from rebirth). Suffering links to that purpose in two ways:
Sikhs believe God is one, all-powerful and loving. This raises the question you studied earlier: how can a good, all-powerful God allow suffering?
Sikhs answer that human minds are limited and God's order is beyond full understanding, that people are free to choose good or evil, and that the right response is to act. Some non-religious people find these answers unconvincing, and may reject belief in God because of suffering.
Sikhs aim to accept hukam with courage and optimism. This does not mean pretending not to hurt. It means keeping faith and hope.
Karma must never be used to blame a sufferer ("you deserved it"). Sikhs are taught to help, not judge.
Sikhs have a duty to relieve suffering. Gurdwaras run langar for all and many Sikhs give time and money to help others.
Sikhs do not all stress the same response. Some put most weight on accepting hukam calmly, while others put most weight on active sewa and resisting injustice. Some explain suffering mainly through karma, while others stress that it is beyond human understanding. Most Sikhs hold several of these views together.
Sikhs also believe they must stand against injustice. Guru Tegh Bahadur, the ninth Guru, gave his life defending the right of people of another faith to practise their religion, when the emperor Aurangzeb was persecuting them. Sikhs see him as an example of protecting other people's freedom.
(a) Identify three causes of moral evil. [3 marks] (AO1)
(b) Choose one religion. Outline two teachings about the causes of evil and suffering in this religion. [4 marks] (AO1)
(c) Choose one religion. Explain why there are different responses to suffering in this religion. [6 marks] (AO1, AO2)
(d) "The existence of suffering proves there is no God." Evaluate this statement, showing you have considered different points of view. In your answer you should refer to at least one religion. [12 marks] (AO1, AO2)
(a) 1. Greed (1) 2. Anger (1) 3. Pride (1)
(b) In Sikhism moral evil comes from haumai, putting the self first (1), so people hurt others to get what they want (1). Sikhs also believe some suffering is the result of karma (1), which means actions have results in this life or earlier ones (1).
(c) Sikhs differ in which response they stress. Some stress chardi kala: accepting God's order with courage and hope (1), because they believe humans cannot fully understand God's will (1). Others stress sewa, because Sikhs have a duty to relieve suffering and this puts belief into action (1), for example through langar open to all (1). Others stress standing against injustice, as Guru Tegh Bahadur did (1), because suffering caused by human wrongdoing can be reduced (1). Most Sikhs combine these and none use karma to blame the sufferer (1).
(d) Plan. For: a good, all-powerful God would stop suffering, especially of innocent children; non-religious explanations such as disease and natural forces need no God. Against: Sikhs say much suffering comes from haumai and human choices, not God; hukam is beyond human understanding; suffering can turn people to God, and chardi kala and sewa help people cope; suffering is a problem for belief, not a proof. Conclusion: suffering raises a serious question and leads some to reject God, but it does not prove there is none, because believers offer reasoned answers, so the statement is not proven.
For "explain why there are different responses", give two or three distinct responses and tie each to a Sikh term and a reason: the reason is what earns the higher level.