😔 Staying can cause suffering
If a marriage is full of cruelty, fear or constant anger, staying together may harm both partners and the children who live with it. Keeping a marriage going just for the sake of it is not compassionate.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseThe lesson Divorce, Remarriage and Marriage Breakdown explained what divorce, annulment and remarriage are, the law, and the non-religious views. Here we look at what Buddhists teach.
In Marriage and the Householder in Buddhism you saw that Buddhists treat marriage as a social and civil matter, not a sacrament. A sacrament is a sacred act in which believers say God is present. Because marriage is not one, there is no religious law that forbids divorce, and none that forbids remarriage. Marriage is a social and civil agreement, so ending it does not break a religious vow.
That does not mean Buddhists think divorce is a good thing. Most see it as regrettable, because it usually involves pain and disappointment. But it is allowed. The question Buddhists ask is not "is it forbidden?" but "what will cause the least suffering?"
Key terms:
A key Buddhist test for an action is whether it causes suffering to others. You met this in Buddhist Teaching on Relationships and Sexuality. Applied to divorce, the test works in two directions.
If a marriage is full of cruelty, fear or constant anger, staying together may harm both partners and the children who live with it. Keeping a marriage going just for the sake of it is not compassionate.
If a partner leaves carelessly or selfishly, or acts from anger or craving, they can hurt a partner and children badly. A Buddhist would ask whether leaving is really the kindest choice.
So there is no automatic answer. Each situation is judged by its likely effect on everyone involved, especially the partners and any children. Buddhists try to act with karuna (compassion), which you met in Euthanasia and Relieving Suffering: Buddhist Views, towards both partners.
Buddhist teaching encourages a couple to try to repair a struggling marriage before ending it. The Buddhist path gives them tools:
Some Buddhists also use counselling and mediation, which you met in the shared lesson, alongside their own practice. If these efforts fail, and staying would cause more suffering than leaving, divorce is accepted.
You studied anicca (impermanence) in Anicca, Anatta and the Five Khandhas. Buddhists teach that everything changes, including feelings, people and relationships. Applied to marriage, this has two lessons. First, a loving relationship is not guaranteed to last for ever, so couples should value and care for it while it exists. Second, when a marriage does end, clinging to the past or to blame only adds to the pain, and accepting change calmly helps people move on.
Since there is no law against remarriage, Buddhists see it as a personal choice. The same test applies: will it cause suffering to anyone? A person who remarries should act honestly and kindly towards a new partner, a former partner and any children. Buddhists would also expect the first marriage to have ended fairly, with no betrayal or cruelty.
Buddhism has no single authority, and Buddhists live in many countries. Attitudes to divorce therefore vary. In some cultures divorce brings strong social pressure and family disapproval, and Buddhists there may feel more reluctant. In others divorce is more common and accepted. Some more traditional teachers stress staying together and patience; others stress the suffering of an unhappy marriage. These differences come from culture and personal judgement, not from a Buddhist rule.
Partners may feel grief, anger or loneliness. Children can feel confused or unsettled. Buddhists would say these feelings are a form of dukkha (suffering), and meditation and kindness can help people through them.
Families support the Sangha and each other. Fellow Buddhists, and often monks and nuns, can offer advice, listening and support, without judging.
Marriage breakdown can mean more single-parent homes, money worries and pressure on support services. Buddhists would stress caring for those who are struggling.
Saying Buddhism forbids divorce: there is no such law. Saying Buddhists think divorce is always fine: it is usually seen as regrettable, and careless leaving causes suffering. Forgetting that staying in a harmful marriage can also cause suffering. Giving only one reason: use the test of suffering to others, working at the marriage first, and impermanence.
(a) Identify three effects of marriage breakdown on individuals. [3 marks]
(b) Choose one religion. Outline two teachings about divorce in this religion. [4 marks]
(c) Choose one religion. Explain why there are different attitudes to remarriage or divorce in this religion. [6 marks]
(d) 'A couple should always try to save their marriage.' Evaluate this statement, showing you have considered different points of view. In your answer you should refer to at least one religion. [12 marks]
(a) 1. Grief or sadness (1) 2. Loneliness (1) 3. Money or housing worries (1)
(b) Buddhism: Marriage is a social and civil matter, not a sacrament (1), so there is no religious law against divorce (1). Buddhists also teach that people should avoid causing suffering to others (1), so both staying in a harmful marriage and leaving carelessly can be wrong because they hurt partners and children (1).
(c) Buddhism has no single authority, so Buddhists decide for themselves using the idea of avoiding suffering. Some stress patience, right speech and compassion, and believe a couple should work hard to repair the marriage, because leaving may hurt children. Others say that staying in a cruel or unhappy marriage causes more suffering, so divorce is the kinder choice. Attitudes also depend on culture, because in some countries divorce is much more accepted than in others. This means Buddhists share the same teaching but apply it in different ways.
(d) Plan. For: Buddhists value patience, right speech and compassion; leaving carelessly can cause suffering to children and partners; non-religious people may say counselling and mediation can help a marriage. Against: marriage is not a sacrament, so there is no duty to stay; staying in a harmful marriage causes suffering; impermanence teaches that relationships change and may end; humanists say it is better to part than to live unhappily. Conclusion: a strong answer might judge that couples should try to repair a marriage first, but not at any cost, because Buddhist teaching asks which choice causes the least suffering, and the word 'always' ignores harmful marriages.
In the 12-mark question, test the word 'always' in the statement: give the Buddhist idea of working at a marriage first, then the idea that staying can cause suffering, and end with a reasoned choice.