💰 Money
CREEP raised about 60 million dollars, a record at the time. Some of it came as illegal secret gifts from big companies. Part of the money was kept as cash to pay for secret work.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseRichard Nixon, a Republican, became President in January 1969. He was clever and hard-working, but he was also deeply suspicious. He believed that the press, anti-war protesters and many government officials were out to destroy him.
His past explains some of this. In 1960 he lost the presidential election to John F. Kennedy by fewer than 120,000 votes out of nearly 69 million. In 1968 he won, but only by about half a million votes. The Democrats still controlled Congress. Nixon was determined that the 1972 election would not be close.
Two events in 1971 show how far the White House was ready to go:
So before Watergate, the men around Nixon had already broken the law and treated opponents as enemies to be crushed.
Key terms:
In 1971 Nixon's supporters set up the Committee to Re-elect the President. Its opponents called it CREEP. From March 1972 it was led by John Mitchell, who gave up his job as Attorney General (the government's chief law officer) to run it.
CREEP raised about 60 million dollars, a record at the time. Some of it came as illegal secret gifts from big companies. Part of the money was kept as cash to pay for secret work.
Money raised for Nixon's re-election paid for spying on and sabotage of the Democrats. A lawyer called Donald Segretti, hired by a White House aide, sent out forged letters on the headed paper of Edmund Muskie, a leading Democrat, that smeared other Democrats. The aim was to set Nixon's rivals against each other.
Two former 'Plumbers' now worked on this side of the campaign: Gordon Liddy, who had been in the FBI, and Howard Hunt, who had been in the CIA. Liddy drew up a plan to spy on the Democrats. A cut-down version, costing about 250,000 dollars, was given the go-ahead. It included bugging the headquarters of the Democratic Party in the Watergate building in Washington DC.
In late May 1972 a team broke into the Democratic offices and planted bugs on telephones. One bug did not work, so they went back.
In the early hours of 17 June 1972 a security guard, Frank Wills, noticed tape holding a door lock open. He called the police. At about 2.30 am, five men were arrested inside the Democratic offices. They wore suits and rubber gloves and carried cameras, bugging equipment and new 100-dollar notes.
The links to Nixon's campaign appeared quickly:
There is no evidence that Nixon ordered the break-in or knew about it beforehand. His crime was what came next.
The White House had a choice: admit that campaign workers had broken the law, or hide the link. It chose to hide it. An honest investigation might also have uncovered the Plumbers and the dirty tricks, and the election was less than five months away.
Nixon's press secretary, Ron Ziegler, called the break-in a 'third-rate burglary attempt'. Mitchell said the burglars were not working for CREEP. In August 1972 Nixon told reporters that no one then working in the White House was involved.
On 23 June 1972, six days after the arrests, Nixon agreed to a plan to get the CIA to tell the FBI to stop following the money, on the false grounds of national security. The plan soon broke down, but it was obstruction of justice.
Hundreds of thousands of dollars were secretly paid to the burglars and their families so that they would stay silent and take the blame.
Liddy shredded papers at CREEP. Files from Hunt's White House safe were later destroyed. John Dean managed the cover-up day by day.
Did it work? At first, yes. In September 1972 only seven men were charged: the five burglars, Hunt and Liddy. Most Americans took little notice. On 7 November 1972 Nixon beat the Democrat George McGovern in a landslide, winning 49 of the 50 states and more than 60 per cent of the votes. In January 1973 all seven men pleaded guilty or were found guilty. It looked as if the story had ended with them.
The result shows how needless the break-in was: Nixon would have won easily without it. But the cover-up now rested on lies, secret payments and the silence of men facing long prison sentences. How it fell apart is covered in Nixon's Resignation and Ford's Pardon.
Don't write that Nixon ordered the break-in: his offence was joining the cover-up. Don't say the burglars were ordinary thieves: they worked for CREEP and were there to bug telephones and photograph papers. And don't say Watergate cost Nixon the 1972 election: he won it by a landslide.
Extract A (a practice extract written for this lesson, in the style of a modern history book)
The Watergate break-in was a farce from start to finish. The burglars, grown men in business suits and rubber gloves, had already botched the job once and were back to mend a bug that did not work. They clumsily left tape on a door where any passing guard could see it. They were found hiding in an office, and address books left in their hotel rooms led investigators straight to the White House.
What impression does the author give about the Watergate break-in?
You must use Extract A to explain your answer. [6 marks]
The author gives the impression that the break-in was a bungled, amateurish operation. This is shown by the language. Calling it 'a farce from start to finish' makes it sound like a comedy, not a serious crime. The words 'botched' and 'clumsily' stress the burglars' mistakes, and 'grown men in business suits and rubber gloves' makes them look ridiculous. The author has also chosen only the details that show failure: the bug that 'did not work', the tape 'any passing guard could see' and the address books that led 'straight to the White House'. Nothing is said about the men's training in the CIA and FBI, or about the first break-in, when the team got in and out without being noticed. By leaving this out, the author makes the burglars seem like fools.
What lifts this to the top level: it names one clear impression, proves it with short quotations about the author's choice of words, and explains what the author chose to stress and to leave out.
Don't retell what the burglars did. The question is about the author. For every point, start with the author: 'The author uses the word...', 'The author stresses...', 'The author leaves out...'. Here, spotting that the extract ignores the burglars' skills and their earlier success is what shows you have analysed the author's selection.