💪 The winners
Austria-Hungary kept Bosnia and learned that threats worked. Germany had shown it would back its ally fully, which made Austria-Hungary bolder in later quarrels with Serbia.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseThe Balkans are the mountainous lands of south-east Europe. For centuries most of the region was ruled by Turkey, also called the Ottoman Empire. By 1905 that empire was so weak that people called it 'the sick man of Europe'. One by one its Balkan peoples had broken away. Greece, Serbia, Romania and Montenegro were independent states, and Bulgaria ran its own affairs. Turkey still held a belt of land across the middle of the Balkans, including Macedonia and Albania.
As Turkish rule declined, a question hung over the region: who would take Turkey's place? The new Balkan states had their own answer, and so did two great powers next door, Austria-Hungary and Russia. That is why trouble here mattered far beyond the Balkans.
Key terms:
Nationalism had driven the Balkan peoples to break away from Turkey. Once they were free, it made them ambitious. Each new state wanted to grow by taking in people of its own nation who still lived under foreign rule.
Serbia was the most ambitious of all. Its independence had been recognised by the great powers in 1878, but millions of Serbs and other South Slavs still lived outside its borders. Some were in Turkish lands to the south. Many more lived under Austria-Hungary, especially in Bosnia and Herzegovina, where Serbs were the largest group. Serbian nationalists dreamed of joining them all in one large Slav state led by Serbia.
In 1903 Serbian army officers murdered their king, who had been friendly to Austria-Hungary. The new king, Peter, looked to Russia for support instead. From then on Serbia was openly hostile to its big neighbour.
Wanted to unite the South Slavs in one state. That meant taking land from Turkey and, one day, from Austria-Hungary.
Feared that Serbian nationalism would break up its empire. Wanted Serbia kept small and weak.
Saw itself as protector of the Slavs. Wanted influence in the Balkans and a sea route for its warships.
Why Austria-Hungary feared Serbia. Austria-Hungary was an empire of many peoples, including Germans, Hungarians, Czechs, Poles, Croats and Serbs. If its South Slavs broke away to join Serbia, other peoples might demand to leave as well, and the empire could fall apart. To its leaders a strong Serbia was a threat to their survival. The head of the Austrian army, Conrad von Hötzendorf, called again and again for a war to crush Serbia.
The rivalry also turned into a trade war. In 1906 Austria-Hungary closed its border to Serbia's main export, livestock, in what became known as the 'Pig War'. It was meant to force Serbia into line. Serbia found new customers and ended up less dependent on Austria-Hungary than before.
Why Russia backed Serbia. Russia was the largest Slav nation and shared the Orthodox Christian faith with the Serbs, so Pan-Slavism was popular there. Russia had practical aims too. Its warships in the Black Sea could only reach the Mediterranean through the Straits, the narrow channels at Constantinople controlled by Turkey, and these were closed to warships. After losing its war against Japan in 1904-05, Russia turned its attention back to the Balkans.
This made a local quarrel dangerous. Behind Serbia stood Russia. Behind Austria-Hungary stood its ally Germany. A clash between a small Balkan state and its neighbour could pull in the great powers.
Bosnia and Herzegovina had been run by Austria-Hungary since 1878, although the two provinces still officially belonged to Turkey. In July 1908 a revolution by a group of reformers, the Young Turks, forced the Sultan of Turkey to bring back a constitution and a parliament. They promised to make the empire strong again. Austria-Hungary feared they might try to take Bosnia back.
What happened
No shot was fired, but the crisis left every power involved more bitter or more reckless.
Austria-Hungary kept Bosnia and learned that threats worked. Germany had shown it would back its ally fully, which made Austria-Hungary bolder in later quarrels with Serbia.
Russia had been humiliated in front of the Slavs it claimed to protect. It was determined not to back down again and began to rebuild its army. Serbia was left angry and eager for revenge.
The crisis ended peacefully only because Russia gave way. If a new quarrel broke out between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, Russia was unlikely to give way a second time. You will see what happened next in the lessons The Balkan Wars, 1912-13 and The Assassination at Sarajevo.
Don't say Austria-Hungary invaded Bosnia in 1908. Its troops and officials had been there since 1878, and the annexation made Bosnia officially part of the empire. Don't say Russia fought for Serbia either. In 1909 Russia backed down, and that humiliation is the reason the crisis mattered. Keep the sides straight too: Germany backed Austria-Hungary, and Russia backed Serbia.
Describe TWO features of EITHER Balkan nationalism in the years 1905-09 OR the Bosnian Crisis (1908-09). [6 marks]
This answer chooses the Bosnian Crisis.
One feature of the Bosnian Crisis was that it began when Austria-Hungary annexed Bosnia and Herzegovina in October 1908. Austria-Hungary had run the two provinces since 1878, but they still officially belonged to Turkey. It acted after the Young Turk revolution in Turkey, because it feared the reformers might try to take Bosnia back.
A second feature was that the crisis ended with Russia and Serbia backing down. Serbia was furious at the annexation and appealed to Russia, which supported it. In March 1909 Germany demanded that Russia accept the annexation. Russia was still weak after its war with Japan, so it gave way, and Serbia then had to accept the annexation too.
What lifts this to the top level: it gives two separate features of the crisis, and each one is backed by precise supporting facts such as dates, countries and reasons.
A feature is something true about the topic itself: how the crisis started, who was involved, how it ended. The question says 'describe', so you do not need to explain the long-term results or judge who was to blame. Choose the alternative you know more facts about, say which one you chose, and give each feature its own short paragraph with two facts. For more help, see the Exam Skills lesson Paper 2 Section A Question (a): Describe Two Features.