📜 Agreements that spread the war
Germany stood by Austria-Hungary. France stood by Russia. Germany's war plan assumed both alliances would work, so a crisis in the east led to an attack in the west. The 1839 treaty then brought in Britain.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseThe days from the ultimatum to the outbreak of war are known as the July Crisis. On 25 July, just before the time limit ran out, Serbia gave its answer. It accepted most of the demands. It would not let Austro-Hungarian officials take part in an inquiry on Serbian soil. That was enough for Austria-Hungary. Its ambassador left Belgrade the same evening.
Britain tried to stop the slide. On 26 July the Foreign Secretary, Sir Edward Grey, proposed a meeting in London of Britain, France, Germany and Italy to settle the quarrel. Germany turned it down the next day.
On 28 July Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. Austria-Hungary and Germany still hoped the war would stay local.
Key terms:
Russia had no treaty with Serbia. It chose to act anyway. It saw itself as the protector of the Slavs, and it had backed down in the Bosnian Crisis. The Tsar would not be humiliated twice.
Why did Germany move so fast? Its war plan was built on the alliances. Germany expected to fight France and Russia together, so the plan was to beat France quickly before Russia's huge army was ready. Every day of Russian mobilisation wasted that head start. To Germany's generals, Russian mobilisation meant war, and war meant attacking France first. The plan itself is explained in the lesson The Schlieffen Plan and Why It Failed.
The quickest way into France was through Belgium. On 2 August Germany demanded that Belgium let its army pass. Belgium refused. On 3 August Germany declared war on France, and on the morning of 4 August German troops crossed the Belgian border.
This broke the Treaty of London of 1839. Britain had been unsure what to do. The Triple Entente was not a military alliance, and the Cabinet was divided about fighting for France or Russia. Belgium settled the argument. Britain sent Germany an ultimatum: leave Belgium alone or face war. It ran out at 11 pm on 4 August. Germany had not agreed. Britain was at war.
The German Chancellor, Bethmann Hollweg, was amazed. The British ambassador reported him saying that Britain was going to war for 'a scrap of paper'.
Britain had other reasons too. It did not want Germany to crush France and control the Channel coast. The treaty gave it a clear reason that united the country.
Germany stood by Austria-Hungary. France stood by Russia. Germany's war plan assumed both alliances would work, so a crisis in the east led to an attack in the west. The 1839 treaty then brought in Britain.
Russia mobilised for Serbia with no treaty. Britain was not bound to France. Germany broke a treaty it had signed. And Italy, a member of the Triple Alliance, did not fight.
Italy declared its neutrality on 3 August. The Triple Alliance was defensive, and Austria-Hungary had attacked Serbia without consulting Italy. Italy also knew that its long coastline would be at the mercy of the British navy. So an alliance on paper counted for little when it did not suit a country's interests.
On 6 August Austria-Hungary declared war on Russia. Five great powers were now at war.
Don't write that Britain went to war because the Triple Entente forced it to. The entente was not a military alliance. Don't say Russia had an alliance with Serbia.
Source A: From a speech by Sir Edward Grey, the British Foreign Secretary, to the House of Commons, 3 August 1914.
'We are not parties to the Franco-Russian Alliance. We do not even know the terms of that Alliance ... If, in a crisis like this, we run away from those obligations of honour and interest as regards the Belgian Treaty, I doubt whether, whatever material force we might have at the end, it would be of very much value in face of the respect that we should have lost.'
Source B: From a telegram sent by Tsar Nicholas II of Russia to Kaiser Wilhelm II of Germany, 29 July 1914. The 'weak country' is Serbia.
'An ignoble war has been declared to a weak country. The indignation in Russia shared fully by me is enormous. I foresee that very soon I shall be overwhelmed by the pressure forced upon me and be forced to take extreme measures which will lead to war ... I beg you ... to do what you can to stop your allies from going too far.'
Extract C: A practice extract written for this lesson, in the style of a modern history textbook.
'In 1914 the great powers were prisoners of their own promises. A quarrel between Austria-Hungary and Serbia became a European war because alliances and treaties pulled in one country after another. Germany was tied to Austria-Hungary, France to Russia, and Britain to Belgium. Yet promises were not everything: Italy ignored its alliance and stayed neutral.'
Study Extract C. Extract C suggests that international agreements were the main reason why the crisis of July 1914 became a European war. How far do you agree with this interpretation? Use Extract C, Sources A and B and your own knowledge to explain your answer. [16 marks]
There is strong evidence for this view. Extract C says the powers were 'prisoners of their own promises' and that agreements 'pulled in one country after another'. Source A supports this for Britain. Grey speaks of 'obligations of honour and interest as regards the Belgian Treaty' and warns of 'the respect that we should have lost' by ignoring it. From my own knowledge, this was the Treaty of London of 1839, and Britain's ultimatum over Belgium ran out on 4 August. Source B also shows alliances at work, because the Tsar asks the Kaiser to 'stop your allies', meaning Austria-Hungary. France, Russia's ally since 1894, refused to promise to stay neutral.
However, the sources also show that agreements did not force every decision. In Source A Grey says 'We are not parties to the Franco-Russian Alliance', so no alliance made Britain fight. He also mentions 'interest': Britain did not want Germany to crush France and control the Channel coast. In Source B the Tsar gives no treaty as his reason. Russia had none with Serbia. He writes of 'indignation in Russia' and 'pressure forced upon me'. Russia chose to protect a Slav country and ordered general mobilisation on 30 July.
Extract C itself admits that 'Italy ignored its alliance'. Italy declared neutrality on 3 August because the Triple Alliance was defensive and Austria-Hungary had attacked. Germany's choices mattered even more. It rejected Grey's meeting, declared war on Russia on 1 August and then invaded Belgium, breaking a treaty that Prussia had signed. An agreement could not stop a power that had decided to fight.
Overall, I agree only partly. The test is whether the agreements forced the powers to act. Mostly they did not. Agreements explain the route by which war spread, from east to west and then to Britain. But Russia acted without a treaty, Italy ignored one and Germany broke one. The decisions of the great powers, above all Germany's, were the main reason, and agreements were the path those decisions followed.
What lifts this to the top level: it weighs both sides using short quotations from the extract and both sources, adds precise facts found in none of them, and reaches a judgement using a clear test.
For every power you mention, ask 'did an agreement force this, or was it a choice?' That one test sorts your evidence into the two sides and gives you your judgement. For more help, see the Exam Skills lesson Paper 2 Section A Question (c): Judging an Interpretation.