Tsarist Rule in Russia, 1905-14 ยป The 1905 Revolution and How Nicholas Survived
What you'll learn this session
Study time: 30 minutes
Edexcel spec: Paper 2 Section A, Investigation A2, Key topic 1
- What happened on Bloody Sunday and why it mattered
- The Potemkin Mutiny and the setting up of Soviets
- What the October Manifesto promised
- The reasons why Nicholas survived the 1905 Revolution
๐ Unlock Full Course Content
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseBloody Sunday, January 1905
In January 1905 a strike began at the Putilov works in St Petersburg after four workers were sacked. It spread quickly across the city. The strikers were led by a priest, Father Georgy Gapon, who ran a workers' organisation that the police had allowed. Gapon decided to take a petition to the Tsar at the Winter Palace. It asked for an eight-hour working day, fair wages, an elected assembly and an end to the war with Japan.
On Sunday 22 January, tens of thousands of workers and their families walked towards the palace from different parts of the city. Many carried icons (religious pictures) and portraits of the Tsar and sang hymns. Nicholas was not there. He was at his palace outside the city. Troops blocked the roads and opened fire, and Cossacks charged the crowds. The government admitted to about 100 deaths. The real number was probably nearer 200, with hundreds more wounded.
(Russia's calendar was then 13 days behind the one used in the West. This lesson uses Western dates. In Russia, Bloody Sunday was 9 January.)
Key terms:
- Petition: a written request, signed by many people, asking a ruler to do something
- Mutiny: a revolt by soldiers or sailors against their own officers
- General strike: a strike by workers in many different industries at the same time
- Soviet: a council of deputies (elected representatives) chosen by workers to speak and act for them
- Manifesto: a public statement of what a ruler or group promises to do
- Duma: an elected Russian parliament
Why Bloody Sunday mattered
Many ordinary Russians had thought of the Tsar as their 'Little Father', who would help them if only he knew how they suffered. Bloody Sunday broke that trust.
- Workers: strikes spread across the empire. By the end of January about 400,000 workers were on strike.
- Peasants: from the spring and summer, peasants seized land and burned landowners' houses.
- Middle classes: they demanded an elected parliament more loudly than ever.
- National minorities: there was unrest in Poland, Finland, Georgia and the Baltic lands.
- Violence: in February the Tsar's uncle, Grand Duke Sergei, was killed by a bomb in Moscow.
The Potemkin Mutiny, June 1905
The Potemkin was a battleship in the Black Sea Fleet. In June 1905 its sailors refused to eat meat that was crawling with maggots. When an officer shot their spokesman, the crew mutinied. They killed the captain and several officers and took over the ship.
The Potemkin sailed to the port of Odessa, where workers were already on strike. Troops fired on the crowds there and many people were killed. Other warships were sent to stop the Potemkin, but their crews refused to fire on it. In the end the sailors gave themselves up in Romania.
The mutiny was dangerous for Nicholas because his rule depended on the armed forces. If they turned against him, he was finished. But the mutiny did not spread through the fleet, and most of the army stayed loyal.
The general strike and the Soviets
The crisis reached its peak in October. A strike by printers and railway workers grew into a general strike. Trains stopped. Factories, shops, schools and banks closed. The cities had no newspapers and little electricity or food. The government was almost helpless.
In St Petersburg, striking workers elected deputies from their factories to a council, the St Petersburg Soviet. It ran the strike, printed its own newspaper and even organised food supplies. A young revolutionary, Leon Trotsky, became its best-known leader. About 50 other towns and cities, including Moscow, set up Soviets of their own. For a few weeks the Soviets looked like a rival government.
The October Manifesto
Nicholas had two choices: crush the revolution with the army, or give way. His most able minister, Sergei Witte, told him that force alone would not work. On 30 October (17 October in Russia) Nicholas signed the October Manifesto. It promised:
- civil rights: freedom of speech, of belief, of meeting and of forming groups, so political parties and trade unions became legal
- an elected Duma, with more people given the vote
- that no law would be passed without the Duma's agreement
On paper, this ended autocracy.
Why Nicholas survived
📜 Opposition split
The Manifesto satisfied most of the middle classes. They stopped backing the strikes, leaving the workers on their own.
💂 A loyal army
Peace with Japan in September brought the troops home. Most of them obeyed orders, and they were used to crush the revolution.
👥 No united enemy
Workers, peasants, the middle classes and the minorities all wanted different things. Nobody led them all.
- The Manifesto divided his opponents. Middle-class liberals (people who wanted an elected parliament and civil rights) had got what they asked for. They were also frightened by the Soviets and by violence. The general strike faded.
- The army stayed loyal. In December soldiers were given better pay and conditions. That month the leaders of the St Petersburg Soviet, including Trotsky, were arrested. An armed rising by workers in Moscow was crushed with artillery, and over 1,000 people died. Troops were then sent into the countryside to punish rebel villages.
- The revolution had no single leader or plan. The different groups never worked together, and leading revolutionaries such as Lenin were abroad for most of 1905.
- The peasants were bought off. In November the government halved the redemption payments for 1906 and ended them from 1907. Unrest in the villages slowly died down.
So Nicholas survived by giving way just enough to split his enemies, then using force against those who fought on. The causes of discontent had not gone away.
Common mistakes
Don't say the Tsar ordered the shooting on Bloody Sunday. He was not in the city, but he was still blamed. Don't say the October Manifesto alone saved him: it split the opposition, and the army then crushed what was left.
Exam-style question
Study Sources A and B.
Source A
From the diary of Tsar Nicholas II, 22 January 1905 (translated).
A painful day. There have been serious disorders in St. Petersburg because workmen wanted to come up to the Winter Palace. Troops had to open fire in several places in the city; there were many killed and wounded. God, how painful and sad.
Source B
From The Story of My Life by Father Georgy Gapon, who led the march on 22 January 1905. He wrote this account later in 1905.
In the first row were the men carrying a large framed portrait of the Tsar ... We were not more than thirty yards from the soldiers ... when suddenly, without any warning and without a moment's delay, was heard the dry crack of many rifle-shots ... another volley was fired, and another, and yet another ... We had gone unarmed.
How far does Source A support the evidence of Source B about the events of Bloody Sunday? Explain your answer. [8 marks]
Model answer
Source A supports Source B about what the soldiers did. Source A says 'Troops had to open fire', and Source B describes 'the dry crack of many rifle-shots'. Both also show that the shooting was heavy. Source A says it happened 'in several places' with 'many killed and wounded', and Source B says that 'another volley was fired, and another, and yet another'.
However, Source A does not support Source B about how the workers behaved. Source A calls the march 'serious disorders', which suggests a dangerous crowd. Source B shows a peaceful and loyal one: the marchers carried 'a large framed portrait of the Tsar' and 'had gone unarmed'. The sources also differ about whether the shooting was needed. Source A says troops 'had to' fire, as if they had no choice. Source B says the marchers 'had gone unarmed' and were fired on 'suddenly', which suggests there was no need for it.
Overall, Source A supports Source B only to a limited extent. They agree on the basic fact that troops fired many times on the workers. They disagree on the more important issue of who was to blame, the crowd or the soldiers.
What lifts this to the top level: it matches short quotations from both sources for agreement and for difference, then judges how far Source A supports Source B.
Exam tip
Look for both agreement and difference, because an answer with only one of them cannot get more than 4 marks. Notice small words that show an attitude, like 'had to' in Source A. Always finish with a clear judgement on 'how far'. For more help, see the Exam Skills lesson Paper 2 Section A Question (b): How Far Does Source A Support Source B?