Stabilisation and Control: The GDR, 1962-87 ยป Propaganda, Censorship, Support and Opposition

What you'll learn this session

Study time: 30 minutes

Edexcel spec: Paper 2 Section A, Investigation A5, Key topic 2

  • How the GDR used propaganda to win people over
  • How censorship limited what people could read, write and say
  • How much support the GDR really had before 1987
  • The forms of opposition: grumbling, dissidents and people who applied to leave

๐Ÿ”’ Unlock Full Course Content

Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!

Unlock This Course

Propaganda: telling people what to think

The GDR was a one-party state run by the SED, the Socialist Unity Party. The SED wanted people to believe in socialism and to accept its rule, so it controlled the messages people heard.

Key terms:

  • Propaganda: information, often one-sided or misleading, used to persuade people to think or act in a certain way.
  • Censorship: the control of what can be printed, said, broadcast or performed, banning anything the state does not like.
  • Conformity: going along with the rules and expectations of the state, whatever you privately think.
  • Dissident: a person who openly disagrees with their government.

GDR propaganda had a few main themes:

  • The GDR was the better Germany. It was shown as a peaceful, fair country with jobs, homes and welfare for all.
  • The West was the enemy. West Germany was described as a home of fascists and greedy capitalists. The Berlin Wall was officially called the "anti-fascist protection rampart", as if it kept the West out rather than keeping East Germans in.
  • Friendship with the Soviet Union. The USSR was presented as a loyal friend and protector.

Propaganda was everywhere. Almost all newspapers belonged to the SED or to organisations it controlled, and they printed the Party line. Factories, schools and streets carried banners and slogans. On 1 May, Labour Day, workers were expected to join huge parades to show support for the state.

Censorship: stopping other views

Propaganda said what the state wanted people to hear. Censorship stopped them hearing anything else. In the GDR:

📰 Books and papers

A state office had to approve books before they were printed. Editors knew what they could not publish, so many checked themselves before the censors did.

🎤 Artists and writers

Songs, plays and poems could be banned. Those who criticised the state could lose the right to publish or perform, and some were forced out of the country.

Two famous cases show how it worked:

  • Wolf Biermann, a songwriter and poet who supported socialism but criticised the SED, was banned from performing in the GDR. In November 1976 he was allowed to tour West Germany, and the GDR then stripped him of his citizenship so he could not return. Many writers and artists protested, and some were punished for it.
  • Rudolf Bahro, an SED member, wrote a book criticising the Party. It was published in West Germany in 1977. He was arrested that year, sentenced to eight years in prison in 1978, and sent to the West in 1979.

Another critic, the scientist Robert Havemann, was placed under house arrest from 1976. Censorship did not stop all criticism, but it made it risky and kept it away from most ordinary people.

How much support did the GDR have?

It is hard to measure, because people who disagreed were careful about what they said. The signs point to a mixed picture.

✅ Signs of support

The SED had more than two million members. Some people truly believed in socialism, or valued the secure jobs, cheap rent and welfare. Many others joined the Party to get on in their careers.

❓ Doubts about the signs

Elections gave voters a single list of candidates, and official results were usually over 99 per cent in favour. These results show control, not real choice.

Most people practised conformity. They went to the parades, joined the organisations, and kept their opinions to themselves. Many focused on family, friends, allotments and weekend cottages. Some historians call this a "niche society", where people lived private lives away from politics. Conformity is not the same as support. It can simply mean people had learned that it was safer to go along with the state.

Opposition before 1987

After the 1953 rising was crushed and the Wall was built, open protest was rare and dangerous. Opposition took quieter forms:

  • Grumbling. Many people complained about shortages, queues and the Party in private, and told political jokes among trusted friends. This was widespread but not organised, and it rarely changed anything.
  • Dissidents. A small number of writers, scientists and church activists spoke out openly, such as Biermann, Bahro and Havemann. They risked arrest, loss of work or expulsion.
  • Applying to leave. The GDR signed the Helsinki Accords in 1975, which promised human rights. Many East Germans used this to apply for permission to leave for the West. Applicants often lost their jobs or were treated as traitors, but the number of applications grew through the 1980s.

So opposition existed, but before 1987 it was small, divided and watched closely, so it did not threaten the state itself.

Common mistakes

  • Treating 99 per cent election results as proof of real support. The voters had no real choice.
  • Saying that conformity means support. Many people complied only out of caution.
  • Saying there was no opposition. There was grumbling, dissidents and applications to leave, but little organised protest.

Exam-style question

This is a Paper 2 Section A (a) question. It tests whether you can describe features with accurate detail.

Describe TWO features of EITHER censorship in the GDR OR the economic problems of the GDR in the 1980s. [6 marks]

Model answer

I will describe censorship in the GDR. One feature was that the state controlled what could be published. A state office had to approve books before they were printed, and almost all newspapers belonged to the SED or its organisations. This meant that criticism of the Party seldom reached the public, and editors often avoided anything the censors might ban.

A second feature was that writers and artists who criticised the state were punished. The songwriter Wolf Biermann was banned from performing, and in November 1976 he was stripped of his citizenship while on tour in West Germany. Rudolf Bahro was sentenced to eight years in prison in 1978 for a book that was published in the West. These cases warned others to keep quiet.

What lifts it to the top level: it gives two clear features, and each one is developed with accurate, specific detail.

Exam tip

Give two different features and add two facts to each. A single feature, however detailed, can only score half marks.

Recap

  • Propaganda presented the GDR as the better Germany and the West as the enemy.
  • Censorship controlled books, newspapers and the arts, and critics such as Biermann and Bahro were punished.
  • Most people conformed, which shows control rather than real support.
  • Opposition before 1987 was grumbling, a few dissidents, and growing numbers applying to leave.
Test Your Knowledge
Chat to History tutor