Setting Up the United Nations Organisation and Its Work to 1964 ยป The UN and the Korean War, 1950-53

What you'll learn this session

Study time: 30 minutes

Edexcel spec: Paper 2 Section B, Breadth study B5, Key topic 3

  • Why the UN could send a force to Korea in 1950
  • How the Security Council voted while the USSR was boycotting it
  • What the 'Uniting for Peace' resolution did
  • How the war ended and what Korea showed about the UN

๐Ÿ”’ Unlock Full Course Content

Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!

Unlock This Course

Why was there a war in Korea?

At the end of the Second World War, Korea was split at the 38th parallel, a line of latitude across the country. Soviet troops held the north and American troops held the south. By 1948 there were two separate states: communist North Korea, led by Kim Il Sung, and South Korea, led by Syngman Rhee. Each claimed to be the government of the whole of Korea.

On 25 June 1950 North Korean forces crossed the 38th parallel and invaded South Korea. Seoul, the southern capital, fell within days.

Key terms:

  • 38th parallel: the line that divided North and South Korea.
  • Boycott: refusing to take part in something as a protest.
  • Ceasefire: an order to stop fighting.
  • Uniting for Peace: a General Assembly resolution of 1950 that let the Assembly act when the Security Council was blocked.

The Security Council acts

The Security Council has five permanent members, and any one of them can use the veto to block a decision. In January 1950 the USSR began a boycott of the Council. It was angry that the seat for China was held by the Nationalist government on Taiwan, not by the communist government that ruled the mainland. So when North Korea invaded, the Soviet seat was empty and nobody could use its veto.

📅 25 June 1950

The Council met on the day of the invasion. It voted by nine votes to none, with Yugoslavia abstaining, to call for a ceasefire and for North Korea to withdraw.

📜 27 June and 7 July

When the North ignored this, the Council recommended that members help South Korea. On 7 July it asked members to send forces under a unified command led by the USA.

This was the first time the UN used armed force against an aggressor. Sixteen countries sent fighting troops, including Britain, Canada, Australia and Turkey, and others sent medical teams. The force fought under the UN flag, and the American General Douglas MacArthur was its commander. The USA supplied most of the foreign troops, and South Korea's own army was also large.

The Soviet Union returned to the Council in August 1950 and called the vote illegal, but it was too late to undo it.

The course of the war

At first the UN forces were pushed back into a small corner of the south. In September 1950 MacArthur landed troops at Inchon, behind the North Korean army, and drove it back. UN forces crossed the 38th parallel in October and advanced towards the border with China. Then China entered the war on the North's side, and by early 1951 the UN forces had been pushed back south again. After that the fighting settled near the 38th parallel.

Uniting for Peace

With the USSR back on the Council, the veto could now block any further action. The USA and its allies therefore turned to the General Assembly, where there is no veto. On 3 November 1950 the Assembly passed the Uniting for Peace resolution. It said that if the Security Council could not act because of a veto, the Assembly could meet within 24 hours and recommend action, including the use of force. The Assembly's decisions were only recommendations, but it was a new way round the veto.

The armistice

Two years of talks followed while the fighting continued. An armistice, an agreement to stop fighting that is not a peace treaty, was signed at Panmunjom on 27 July 1953. The border was set close to the 38th parallel, with a demilitarised zone on each side of it. No peace treaty was ever signed, so the two Koreas have stayed divided.

What did Korea show about the UN?

✅ Strengths

The UN could act quickly and with force, which the League never did. South Korea was not conquered, and the aggressor was beaten back.

❌ Weaknesses

It only worked because the USSR was absent. The force was really led by the USA, and the UN could not make China withdraw or end the division of Korea.

Changed: unlike the League, which had no army, the UN fought a war to defend South Korea. Stayed the same: action still depended on the Great Powers agreeing, and the UN could not end a war once China had joined in.

Common mistakes

  • Saying the USSR voted for the action. It was absent, so it did not vote at all.
  • Calling the Korea force a UN army. It was a force of volunteered national troops under a US commander.
  • Forgetting Uniting for Peace was passed by the Assembly, not the Security Council.

Exam-style question

Explain TWO ways in which the response of the UN to the invasion of South Korea in 1950 was different from the response of the League of Nations to the Japanese invasion of Manchuria in 1931. [6 marks]

(Remember that in 1931 Japan invaded the Chinese region of Manchuria, and the League sent a commission of enquiry.) You must give two ways. One way alone can score no more than half marks.

Model answer

One difference is speed. The Security Council met on 25 June 1950, the day of the invasion, and ordered a ceasefire, and within two weeks it had asked members to send forces. In contrast, after Japan invaded Manchuria on 18 September 1931, the League only appointed the Lytton Commission in December, and its report did not come until October 1932.

A second difference is the use of force. In Korea sixteen countries sent troops under a UN commander and fought North Korea. The League had no army and its members would not send soldiers, so against Japan it only issued a report and condemned it, and Japan left the League in 1933 without being stopped.

What lifts it to the top level: each way compares the two organisations directly, with a precise fact about both Korea and Manchuria.

Exam tip

For a "different from" question, write each paragraph with "whereas" or "in contrast" so that one sentence holds a fact about both sides.

Test Your Knowledge
Chat to History tutor