The problem the UN could not solve
The Palestine problem did not end with the armistices of 1949. Israel and its Arab neighbours stayed in conflict. Many Palestinian Arabs were refugees, and borders were not agreed. For the next forty years the UN kept returning to the Middle East. It passed resolutions, sent observers and sent soldiers. Yet the quarrel went on. That is why the spec calls it a case study in limited success.
Israelis argued that their state needed secure borders and Arab recognition. Arab states and Palestinians argued that land had been lost and refugees had never been given justice. Both sides could point to UN resolutions to support their case, and that is part of the story.
Key terms:
- Occupied territories: land taken in war and held by the winner's army.
- Land for peace: the idea that Israel would give up occupied land in return for peace and recognition.
- Buffer zone: a strip of land between two armies, patrolled by UN peacekeepers.
The Six-Day War and Resolution 242 (1967)
In May 1967 Egypt's president, Nasser, asked the UN to remove its peacekeepers (UNEF) from the Egyptian side of the border. The Secretary-General, U Thant, withdrew them. War followed in June 1967. In six days Israel captured the Sinai Peninsula and the Gaza Strip from Egypt, the West Bank and East Jerusalem from Jordan, and the Golan Heights from Syria. These became the occupied territories.
On 22 November 1967 the Security Council passed Resolution 242 unanimously. It was drafted by Britain. It called for:
- the withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;
- an end to claims of war and respect for the independence and territory of every state in the area, with the right to live in peace within secure and recognised boundaries;
- a just settlement of the refugee problem.
The UN also appointed a special representative, Gunnar Jarring, to help the sides reach agreement. This is the "land for peace" idea in action.
The Yom Kippur War and Resolution 338 (1973)
Six years later nothing had been settled. On 6 October 1973 Egypt and Syria attacked Israeli forces in Sinai and the Golan Heights. After heavy fighting the USA and the USSR, who backed opposite sides, agreed that the war should stop. On 22 October 1973 the Security Council passed Resolution 338 by 14 votes to none, with China not taking part. It called for:
- a ceasefire within 12 hours;
- the carrying out of Resolution 242 in all its parts;
- talks between the sides to reach a just and lasting peace.
Resolution 338 called for a ceasefire, which was only partly kept at first. It did not solve the underlying problem.
✅ What the UN achieved
It stopped wars when the sides were ready to stop. It gave everyone an agreed starting point for talks. Egypt and Israel later made peace in 1979, and Israel handed Sinai back to Egypt by 1982. Peacekeepers kept the borders quieter.
❌ What it did not achieve
Israel stayed in most of the occupied territories. There was no settlement for the refugees. The wars of 1967 and 1973 were not prevented, and no lasting peace followed from either resolution.
Why the resolutions were not carried out
- Unclear wording. The English text said "territories", not "the territories" or "all territories". Israel said this allowed it to keep some land. Arab states said it meant all of it.
- Disagreement between the sides. Israel would not leave land until it had peace and secure borders. In September 1967 Arab leaders meeting at Khartoum said no peace, no recognition and no talks with Israel. The Palestinian leadership at the time also rejected 242, because it spoke of refugees rather than of a Palestinian people with national rights.
- No force behind the words. The resolutions asked the sides to act. The UN had no army of its own and did not use sanctions or force to make Israel or its neighbours obey.
- Cold War rivalry. The USA backed Israel and the USSR backed Egypt and Syria. Each could use its veto in the Security Council to block action against its friends, so the Council struggled to go beyond words.
- Facts on the ground. Israel began building settlements in the occupied territories after 1967, which made withdrawal harder.
UN peacekeepers on the borders
Where the sides agreed, peacekeepers could help. After the 1973 war the Council set up a second UN Emergency Force (UNEF II) on 25 October 1973. It patrolled a buffer zone between Egyptian and Israeli forces in Sinai. In May 1974, after Israel and Syria agreed to pull their forces apart, the UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) was set up to patrol a buffer zone on the Golan Heights. UNDOF remains there.
These forces were lightly armed and used force only in self-defence. They could watch and report, but could not stop a determined army. In 1967 Egypt simply asked UNEF to leave, and it went.
Change and continuity
The League of Nations also failed to settle disputes when great powers did not support it. The UN did better at ceasefires and peacekeeping, but in the Middle East it still depended on the consent of the sides and the great powers. In 1947-49 the UN shaped events. After 1967 it could mostly manage the conflict rather than end it.
Common mistakes
- Mixing up the two resolutions. 242 (1967) is about land and peace after the Six-Day War. 338 (1973) is a ceasefire call in the Yom Kippur War that also repeated 242.
- Saying the UN "did nothing". It passed resolutions, stopped fighting and kept peacekeepers on the borders. Its limits are the point.
- Taking a side. In your answers, explain what each side wanted and why.
Exam-style question
Explain TWO causes of the failure to carry out UN Resolution 242 after 1967. [8 marks]
Remember: one cause alone cannot score more than half marks. For each cause, give precise facts and explain how it led to the failure.
Model answer
One cause was that the sides disagreed about what the resolution meant and what should come first. Resolution 242 asked for Israeli withdrawal from "territories occupied in the recent conflict", but the English wording did not say "all" territories. Israel said it could keep some land until it had peace and secure borders. In September 1967 Arab leaders at Khartoum had refused peace, recognition or talks with Israel. Because each side wanted the other to move first, the "land for peace" exchange never happened.
A second cause was that nothing forced the sides to obey. The resolution was a request, and the UN had no army to enforce it or sanctions to punish those who ignored it. The Cold War made things worse. The USA backed Israel and the USSR backed Egypt and Syria, and each could use its veto to block action against its friend in the Security Council. So after 1967 Israel stayed in most of the occupied territories and the Council did not act.
What lifts it to the top level: two causes, each backed by precise facts and a clear link to the failure.
Exam tip
Start each paragraph with the word "cause" in your own words ("One cause was..."), then finish by tying it back to the outcome in the question.