The Creation of Israel, the War of 1948-49 and the Suez Crisis of 1956 ยป Palestinian Refugees, the Law of Return and Border Raids

What you'll learn this session

Study time: 30 minutes

Edexcel spec: Paper 2 Section B, Breadth study B7, Key topic 2

  • Why about 700,000 Palestinians left or were driven from their homes in 1947-49
  • Life in the refugee camps and why the question of return was never settled
  • What Israel's Law of Return of 1950 said, and why it angered Arabs
  • How border raids and Israeli reprisals made the conflict more violent

๐Ÿ”’ Unlock Full Course Content

Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!

Unlock This Course

The Palestinian refugee problem

The fighting of 1947-49 changed the lives of ordinary people as well as the map. 'Disputed territorial claims' is one of the themes that run through this breadth study, and the refugees became one of the hardest disputes of all.

Key terms:

  • Refugee: a person forced to leave their home, and often their country, because of war or danger.
  • Refugee camp: a place set up to shelter people who have lost their homes. Many began as rows of tents.
  • Law of Return: an Israeli law of 1950 giving Jews from anywhere in the world the right to settle in Israel.
  • Reprisal: an attack carried out in revenge for an earlier attack.

Between 1947 and 1949 about 700,000 Palestinian Arabs left or were driven from the land that became Israel. They are the Palestinian refugees. There was no single cause, and historians still argue about how much each one mattered:

😨 Fear

On 9 April 1948 Irgun and Lehi fighters attacked the village of Deir Yassin near Jerusalem and killed more than 100 villagers. News of it spread fast and made many Arabs fear for their lives.

🚪 Expulsion

In some places Israeli forces ordered people out. In July 1948 tens of thousands of Arabs were forced to leave the towns of Lydda and Ramle.

  • War: villages and towns were fought over, and many families fled to escape the shelling and gunfire, expecting to return when it stopped.
  • Loss of leadership: many wealthy and leading Arab families left early, so people in towns such as Haifa and Jaffa were left without leaders.

Some accounts say Arab leaders told people to leave. Many historians have found little evidence of a general order like this, so you should be careful before using it as a cause.

Life in the camps

Most refugees ended up in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank, or in the neighbouring countries of Lebanon, Syria and Jordan. Many lived in camps, first in tents and later in small huts and houses. The camps were crowded, and there was little work for people who had lost their land and property. In 1949 the UN set up the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which began work in 1950. It gave the refugees food, schooling and health care.

The dispute over return

In December 1948 the UN General Assembly said that refugees who wished to return home and live in peace should be allowed to, and that the others should be paid compensation. The two sides disagreed about what should happen:

🏠 The Palestinian and Arab view

The refugees had lived on the land for generations and had a right to go back. The Arab states demanded that the refugees be allowed to return.

🔒 The Israeli view

The refugees had left during a war that Arab states began, and letting them all back would be a danger to Israel's security. It would also leave Jews as a smaller part of the population. Israel refused mass return.

Israel did not allow the refugees back, and most of their land and houses came under Israeli control. The refugee problem was left unsolved, and it stayed at the centre of the conflict for decades.

The Law of Return, 1950

In July 1950 the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, passed the Law of Return. It said that Jews from anywhere in the world had the right to come to Israel to live. Israel had been founded as a home for Jewish people, and many Holocaust survivors in Europe still needed a place to go. Jews from Arab countries, such as Iraq and Yemen, also came in large numbers. In its first few years Israel took in about 700,000 Jewish immigrants, roughly doubling its Jewish population.

Why the law angered Arabs

Arabs saw an unfair contrast. A Jew from any country could settle in Israel, but Palestinians whose families had lived there were not allowed back.

Border raids and reprisals

After the armistice of 1949 the borders between Israel and its neighbours were poorly marked and hard to guard. Many Palestinian refugees crossed them, often just to go home, collect belongings, or harvest crops from their old land. Some crossings were attacks, and some Israelis were killed by armed raiders.

Israel's government answered with a policy of reprisals. It hit back much harder than the original attack, hoping to make Arab governments stop the crossings. In October 1953 an Israeli unit led by Ariel Sharon attacked the village of Qibya in Jordan, after a mother and her two children had been killed in an Israeli town. 69 villagers were killed, many of them women and children. The UN Security Council condemned the attack. In February 1955 Israel attacked Egyptian forces in Gaza, and that helped push Egypt towards seeking arms from abroad. The raids and reprisals fed each other and made war more likely.

Change and continuity: terrorism in the 1940s and the 1950s

In the 1940s the violence was mostly carried out by armed groups such as the Irgun and Lehi, which were fighting the British Mandate. By the early 1950s the main violence was along the borders, between Palestinian refugees and Israel's army. What stayed the same was that civilians were killed and each act of violence led to revenge.

Common mistakes

  • Writing that all Palestinians were simply expelled, or that all simply chose to leave. Historians point to fear, war and expulsion together.
  • Confusing the Law of Return, which was about Jews settling in Israel, with the refugee dispute, which was about Palestinians returning.
  • Saying the raids were only attacks by Arabs. Israeli reprisals such as Qibya were a major part of the story.

Exam-style question

Explain TWO ways in which the violence in Palestine in the 1940s was different from the border violence between Israel and its neighbours in the early 1950s. [6 marks]

Remember: one way on its own cannot score more than half marks, and each way must say something about both periods.

Model answer

One difference was who carried out the violence. In the 1940s it was mainly armed groups such as the Irgun and Lehi, who bombed the King David Hotel in 1946 to force Britain out, whereas in the early 1950s much of it was done by Israel's army, for example the reprisal on Qibya in October 1953, which killed 69 villagers.

A second difference was the purpose. In the 1940s the Irgun and Lehi wanted to end British rule in Palestine, but in the early 1950s many of the people crossing the border were refugees who had been driven out in 1948 and wanted to reach their old homes and land, and Israel's reprisals were meant to stop them.

What lifts this to the top level: each way compares both periods directly, with a precise fact about each.

Exam tip

For a 'different' question, use the words 'whereas' or 'but' so that each way clearly holds one fact from each period.

Test Your Knowledge
Chat to History tutor