Tension and Conflict, 1956-73 ยป The Yom Kippur War, 1973

What you'll learn this session

Study time: 30 minutes

Edexcel spec: Paper 2 Section B, Breadth study B7, Key topic 3

  • Why Sadat planned a war in 1973 and what he wanted from it
  • Why the Arab attack at first succeeded
  • How Israel recovered and why the fighting stopped
  • The effects of the war on the Arab-Israeli conflict

๐Ÿ”’ Unlock Full Course Content

Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!

Unlock This Course

Why Sadat wanted a war

After the Six-Day War of 1967 Israel held the whole Sinai Peninsula, right up to the Suez Canal. Egypt's president Nasser died in 1970 and Anwar Sadat took his place. Sadat tried peaceful ways first. He offered Israel talks about a partial deal on Sinai, but Israel would not hand back the land without a full peace. The stalemate suited Israel, and the USA and the Soviet Union did little to change it.

Sadat decided that only a war could break the deadlock. He did not expect to destroy Israel. His aims were:

  • To win back Sinai, or at least start the process.
  • To restore Arab pride after the humiliation of 1967.
  • To shock the great powers into acting, so that Israel would have to talk seriously.

Syria's president, Hafez al-Assad, joined him because he wanted the Golan Heights back. Sadat had sent Soviet advisers home in 1972, but he still bought modern Soviet weapons.

Key terms:

  • Yom Kippur: the holiest day of the Jewish year, a day of fasting and prayer when almost everything in Israel stops.
  • Bar-Lev Line: a chain of Israeli forts and a huge sand wall along the east bank of the Suez Canal.
  • Oil weapon: using oil supplies and prices as a form of pressure. Arab oil producers used it in 1973.

The attack: October 1973

At about 2 pm on 6 October 1973, which was Yom Kippur, Egypt and Syria attacked together. Thousands of Egyptian soldiers crossed the Suez Canal in small boats. Engineers washed holes in the sand wall of the Bar-Lev Line using high-pressure water hoses, and bridges were built across the canal. In the north, hundreds of Syrian tanks pushed into the Golan Heights.

Why the Arab attack at first succeeded

🌟 Surprise

Israel's leaders were sure that the Arab armies were too weak to attack. Even when warnings came, they were slow to act. Many Israelis were at home or at prayer, and many army reservists were away for the holiday.

💥 Better weapons and planning

Soviet-made anti-tank missiles knocked out many Israeli tanks. Missiles that shot down aircraft covered the battlefield, so Israel's air force could not rule the sky as it had in 1967.

The Egyptian and Syrian armies had also trained for months for one clear task, and they attacked together on two fronts. Within days Egypt held a strip of land on the east bank of the canal, and Israel was fighting on two fronts at once.

Israel recovers

Israel then fought back. Its reservists were called up and rushed to the fronts within days. On the Golan the Syrian advance was stopped, and Israeli troops pushed the Syrians back to within artillery range of Damascus. In the south, Egyptian tanks moved forward beyond their missile cover on 14 October and lost many tanks. Soon afterwards an Israeli force under General Ariel Sharon crossed to the west bank of the canal and trapped the Egyptian Third Army.

The USA also sent Israel a large airlift of weapons. The superpowers' part is covered in the lesson The Cold War and the Arab-Israeli Conflict. On 22 October the UN Security Council called for a ceasefire (Resolution 338). Fighting went on for a few more days, but it ended by 25 October. More than 2,500 Israelis and many thousands of Arab soldiers had died.

Effects of the war

  • The oil weapon. Arab oil producers cut production and stopped selling oil to the USA and some other countries that backed Israel. The price of oil roughly quadrupled and countries in the West faced shortages. The world could no longer ignore the conflict.
  • Sadat's standing. Although the Third Army was trapped, Egyptians remembered the crossing of the canal as a victory. Sadat became a hero in the Arab world and could now negotiate from a stronger position.
  • Israel's shaken confidence. Israel had survived, but it had been caught by surprise. Many people blamed their leaders. A commission of inquiry criticised army chiefs, and Prime Minister Golda Meir resigned in 1974. Israelis no longer felt that their army could not be beaten.
  • A push to talk. Both sides had seen the cost of another war. The talks that followed are covered in the lesson Kissinger and Shuttle Diplomacy, 1973-75.

Change and continuity: in 1967 Israel won in six days and the Arabs were humbled. In 1973 the Arabs did far better, and neither side could claim an easy win. But the land was still disputed and the Palestinian problem was still unsolved.

Common mistakes

  • Saying that Egypt and Syria won. Israel won on the battlefield, but the Arab states gained in pride and in power to negotiate.
  • Saying that Sadat wanted to destroy Israel. His main aim was to recover Sinai and force talks.
  • Mixing up the wars. In 1967 Israel attacked first. In 1973 Egypt and Syria did.
  • Writing only about the surprise. Always add how Israel recovered, and the long-term effects.

Exam-style question

Explain TWO ways in which Egypt's position after the 1973 war was different from its position after the Six-Day War of 1967. [6 marks]

(After 1967, Israel held all of Sinai and Egypt's army had been beaten in six days.) Make each way a direct comparison, with a fact about 1967 and a fact about 1973. One way only can score no more than half marks.

Model answer

One difference was the reputation of the army. After 1967 Egypt's air force had been destroyed on the ground and its army had retreated across Sinai, so Egyptians felt shamed. After 1973 the army was seen as having done well, because it crossed the Suez Canal and broke through the Bar-Lev Line, so Egypt's pride was restored.

Another difference was the standing of its leader. After 1967 Nasser was so discredited that he offered to resign on 9 June. After 1973 Sadat was treated as a hero in the Arab world, and he could now negotiate with Israel from a stronger position.

This is a top answer because each way compares both periods with specific facts.

Exam tip

Use a frame such as "After 1967 ..., whereas after 1973 ...". If a paragraph has facts about only one date, it is not a comparison.

Test Your Knowledge
Chat to History tutor