📢 Second wave (1960s-70s)
Large groups campaigned together for clear goals, such as equal pay and an end to sex discrimination. Their success is taught in Feminism, Dagenham and the Equal Pay and Sex Discrimination Acts.
Sign up to access the complete lesson and track your progress!
Unlock This CourseBy the 1990s, women in Britain had the vote, and laws against unequal pay and sex discrimination had been passed in the 1970s. Many people thought the fight was over. Yet women still did not have equal power. A new generation of feminists, mostly young women, began to speak up. Historians call this movement third-wave feminism. The name suggests three "waves" of feminism: the campaign for the vote (the first), the Women's Liberation movement of the 1960s and 1970s (the second) and this new one from the 1990s (the third). The term became popular in 1992, when the American writer Rebecca Walker used it in a magazine article.
Key terms:
Large groups campaigned together for clear goals, such as equal pay and an end to sex discrimination. Their success is taught in Feminism, Dagenham and the Equal Pay and Sex Discrimination Acts.
Less a single organised campaign, more a spread of ideas. It said women should be free to choose their own lives, and it listened to women of different races, classes and backgrounds, not just one group.
The third wave also fought sexism in everyday culture: how women were shown in magazines and adverts, and the idea that women should be quiet or "ladylike". In Britain the pop group the Spice Girls made "girl power" a popular slogan in 1996. Supporters said this brought feminist ideas to millions of young people. Critics said it was a slogan to sell records, with little power to change laws or pay. Historians still disagree about how much real change third-wave feminism caused. It is hard to point to a single law it won, so its impact was mainly on attitudes.
Parliament shows how slowly power changed. Before 1997, Parliament was overwhelmingly male. In the 1992 general election only 60 women were elected as MPs, about 9 per cent of the House of Commons. In the 1970s, fewer than 30 MPs had been women.
The 1997 election was a turning point. A record 120 women were elected, exactly double the 1992 figure. Most were Labour MPs, helped by the party's use of all-women shortlists (lists of candidates in some seats where only women could be chosen). Newspapers called the new Labour women "Blair's Babes", a nickname many of the women disliked because it did not treat them as serious politicians. In 2006 Margaret Beckett became Britain's first woman Foreign Secretary.
But progress was uneven. Labour's all-women shortlists were ruled unlawful by an employment tribunal in 1996 and were dropped, and Parliament only made them legal again in 2002. At the 2010 election 143 women were elected, 22 per cent of MPs. That was the highest figure so far, but it still meant that about four in every five MPs were men.
By the 1990s the law said women must get equal pay for equal work. Yet women still earned less on average than men. Reasons included:
The glass ceiling explained why so few women reached the top. Women could be promoted to middle jobs, but then seemed to hit an invisible barrier. Few were bosses of big companies or senior judges, and the top jobs went mostly to men. There was no rule stopping them, so the barrier was made of attitudes: managers choosing people "like themselves", long-hours cultures that suited those with fewer home duties, and old ideas about what women could do.
Many more women worked and sat in Parliament. The number of women MPs doubled in 1997. Public attitudes became more open to equality.
Men still held most top jobs and about four in five seats in the Commons. Women still earned less on average, so equality was far from complete.
This is the key idea for the exam: laws gave women equal rights on paper, but sexism was a barrier to change that carried on into the 21st century.
This is a Paper 2, Section B type (a) question, worth 6 marks. Compare two things and give a specific fact about both sides in each way. One way alone can score no more than 3 marks.
Explain TWO ways in which the barriers facing women in the 1990s and 2000s were similar to the barriers facing women in the 1960s and 1970s. [6 marks]
Way 1: pay. In 1968 the women machinists at Ford in Dagenham were paid less than men for skilled work, and they went on strike. Equal pay laws followed in the 1970s, but in the 1990s and 2000s women still earned less than men on average, because they were more likely to work part time or in lower-paid jobs. In both periods women were paid less than men despite the campaigns.
Way 2: political power. In the 1970s fewer than 30 MPs were women, so Parliament was dominated by men. In 2010 the record number of 143 women MPs was still only 22 per cent of the Commons, so men still held about four in five seats. In both periods men held most political power.
Why this reaches the top level: each way is an explicit comparison, with a precise fact about both periods.
Write "In the 1970s... whereas/just as in 2010..." in each paragraph, so that both periods appear in every way. Facts about only one period score less.